John W. Lemons III writes:
> I think I've figured out their problem... They are using FTGate to retrieve
> the mail from their ISP who places all their mail in a multi-drop mailbox.
> Then the "smartpop" stuff in FTGate pulls the info from the ISPs drop box
> and distributes it to the various local mail boxes, but can't distribute
> some of the messages because the ISP is not modifying the message headers to
> append the "expected" X-Recipient header derived from the RECV TO:
> information from the envelope. Is it just me, or does this sound
> non-standard? Any RFCs on this?
Tell them that they cannot reliably do what they want unless their ISP
cooperates. These things *are* completely non-standard, but can be
made to work if the ISP stuffing the mail into the mailbox writes the
same information expected by the software downloading from the pop3
box.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | A hate crime makes
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | it illegal to think certain
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | thoughts. The crime is
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | itself already a crime.
