qmail Digest 17 Oct 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1156
Topics (messages 50659 through 50706):
Using QMAIL and SENDMAIL
50659 by: Jon
50660 by: Brett Randall
qmail Memphis RPM relaying by default?
50661 by: Nicolas MONNET
Spam control
50662 by: Kris Keele
50675 by: Alexander Jernejcic
Re: qmail-local.c bug?
50663 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: courier-imapd & netscape messanger for windows == complete fuckup... any ideas?
50664 by: Tim Hunter
50666 by: Martin Jespersen
Re: emergency phone numbers (was: Volunteers for a multilog patch?)
50665 by: Peter Samuel
How to hide the ip address of the client sender from the message header?
50667 by: Francesco Munaretto
50668 by: Chris Johnson
virtual domains
50669 by: Marco
50701 by: Marco
qmail-pop3d
50670 by: Jeroen ten Berge
50672 by: Alexander Jernejcic
50700 by: Jeroen ten Berge
Re: fastforward
50671 by: Carsten Mueller
50680 by: Brett Randall
Re: tcpserver daemon tools and xinetd
50673 by: Dave Sill
Re: Directory ownerships
50674 by: Dave Sill
Sended mails disappears
50676 by: Mike A. Sauvain
Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
50677 by: davi.avati.com.br
50678 by: Tony Publiski
50679 by: davi.avati.com.br
50690 by: Peter Green
newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
50681 by: Robert Eric Pearse
50682 by: Brett Randall
50683 by: Ronny Haryanto
50684 by: Brett Randall
50685 by: Robert Eric Pearse
50686 by: Brett Randall
50687 by: Robert Eric Pearse
Aliases
50688 by: joan.iaeste-catalunya.upc.es
50689 by: Brett Randall
devlivery problem
50691 by: Mike A. Sauvain
50692 by: Brett Randall
50693 by: Mike A. Sauvain
50694 by: Ihnen, David
50695 by: Brett Randall
50696 by: Mike A. Sauvain
vpopmail
50697 by: Colin Humphreys
50698 by: Peter Green
Limiting simultaneous connections from an IP address
50699 by: frob.webcentral.com.au
Send email very slowly
50702 by: Paulus Hendarwan
limit user's space
50703 by: zhjin.21ilink.com
convert sendmail to qmail
50704 by: zhjin.21ilink.com
50706 by: Robin S. Socha
qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26 - security fix
50705 by: Krzysztof Dabrowski
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
On my companys site we handle a few large mailing lists and sending one
though sendmail takes a few hours at the moment and is getting longer! We
want to setup QMAIL on the server so we can send the newsletters though
qmail from our perl scripts. We don't want to use qmail for all pop3 etc at
the moment.
So is it possable to setup qmail on the server and just use it to send
emails though it from perl? And keep sendmail running for everything else?
Thanks in advance,
Jon
"Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On my companys site we handle a few large mailing lists and sending one
> though sendmail takes a few hours at the moment and is getting longer! We
> want to setup QMAIL on the server so we can send the newsletters though
> qmail from our perl scripts. We don't want to use qmail for all pop3 etc at
> the moment.
What makes you think that using qmail means you have to use it for
POP3? You can use qmail for smtp only, you know. It is totally
compatible with the /var/spool/mail/user format if you NEED to
continue using it. Think about it...it is more secure, more flexible,
more everything. You won't regret a changeover and it will save you a
whole lot of hassle trying to run two smtp servers at once.
> So is it possable to setup qmail on the server and just use it to send
> emails though it from perl? And keep sendmail running for everything else?
Theoretically, yes. But am I going to be the poor sod to try and
explain sendmail and qmail on one system? Not likely...
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jon
Take my advice and you won't regret it. Promise.
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
I had to reinstall Qmail a couple months ago, and used the Memphis RPM. I
didn't pay much attention to default parameters, as I copied qmail/control
from my old install. Well it turns out that Memphis is using tcprules, and
tcprules.d/qmail-smtpd happened to be:
:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
... Which I found out the hard way after a spammer used my system as a
relay ...
Doh!
I don't know how it got set up that way.
Being a newbie to Qmail I am interested in how other people are controlling
their spam rules. I run quite a few virtual domains that require me to allow
people from other networks than my own to send and receive mail through my
server. What is the best way to setup your server so you can't be used to
spam people to death, but still let your users get in and out?
KRis
hi,
there are quite a lot of mailthreads concerning this in the list-archive.
but to put the in a nutshell:
set up rcpthosts carefully
put ip's allowed to relay in tcp.smtp
tell tcpserver to use tcp.smtp.cdb (-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb)
that should do the basic setup for not to be an open relay.
for further setups (authentication etc) go through the archive and
have a look at the qmail homepage http://www.qmail.org/
and - of course - read Dave Sill's
Life With Qmail http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html
;) a
==============================================
Alexander Jernejcic
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs
I am a Signature, not a Virus!
end
==============================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Keele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Spam control
>
>
> Being a newbie to Qmail I am interested in how other people are controlling
> their spam rules. I run quite a few virtual domains that require me to allow
> people from other networks than my own to send and receive mail through my
> server. What is the best way to setup your server so you can't be used to
> spam people to death, but still let your users get in and out?
>
> KRis
>
>
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 05:57:46AM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Peter van Dijk writes:
> > It's a bug, and it's an overflow-like one, but it doesn't seem
> > exploitable just now. Scares the shit out of me nonetheless.
>
> You are confused. The qmail-local program runs with the permissions of
> the user who owns the .qmail file. The treatment of bogus .qmail files
> has no relevance to security.
Hmmm, very good point there. However, would you admit that this is, even
tho not security-related, a bug?
Do take note that when I say 'exploitable' I'm using it in a very broad
way - I'd call a buffer overflow in 'nslookup' exploitable (actually, I
did :) even if users can't gain any extra privs with it.
Hmm, what about the case where people have ftp access with the added
'bonus' that their .qmail files get a +x, or any other legitimate way of
editing .qmail files with a +x? I know of at least one free-hosting
company that does so. What if it turns out that they can use this bug to
make qmail-local execute arbitrary code?
Greetz, Peter
--
dataloss networks
'/ignore-ance is bliss' - me
I am using courier-imap with Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger,
and Eudora, along with sqwebmail.
It is a wonderful product.
I don't have any problems, even with somewhere around 30 folders and
subfolders.
I have a good feeling you have misconfigured something.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Jespersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 2:22 PM
To: Georg Lutz
Cc: Qmail mailing list
Subject: Re: OT: courier-imapd & netscape messanger for windows ==
complete fuckup... any ideas?
Hi Georg,
Definition
root-level folders = folders on the same level as the INBOX in the
filesystem directory structure.
Example:
INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
Trash == ~mylogin/Trash/
Sent == ~mylogin/Sent/
etc...
I have made a Maildir folder under ~mylogin as ~mylogin/Maildir/ using
maildirmake and there is no
problem delivering to it or reading from it.
The problem is this: Courier-imapd refuse to create root-level folders and
insists that all folders
should be created as subfolder of the INBOX folder.
Example:
INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/Trash/
Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/Sent/
Furthermore, since courier-imapd uses '.' as separator instead of the
standard '/' that other
Maildir-like message structures like Mh use all folders are created with a .
infront.
Example:
INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Trash/
Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Sent/
The problem basically seems to be that the guy who wrote courier-imapd is so
hooked on the rfc's
that he made a imap server that breakes all clients :( (or at least netscape
messanger and microsoft
outlook, which are used by the larger part of internet users as MUA)
At first i thought that this was due to the silly choice of personal
Namespace that he made, ie.
INBOX which is a more or less reserved word in most MUA's.
But although i patched the source to use PRIVA instead it still fucked up.
So i guess it might be the '.' seperator that is the problem, though i am in
know way knowledgable
enough about the imap specs to base this on anything else than gut-feeling
as a professional
programmer of many years.
But before i take on the task of making a complete working patch for courier
imapd which supports
standard MUA's i would like to be sure that no-one has done this before me,
since i am hard pressed
on time as it is, and actually need a good working imap server that supports
Maildir now ;)
I thought about contacting the guy who wrote it, but i must admit that after
reading the FAQ and
BUGS section on the download site i doubt very much that he in anyway cares
about my problems since
he seems to think that all MUA's that doesn't speak imap his way should be
fixed *shrug*.
That is an attitude that is hard to find usefull for the rest of us IMHO.
Regards
Martin Jespersen
Georg Lutz wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> what do you mean by "root-level-folders" ?
> With a MUA you can only create folders in your INBOX. If you want to
> create public-shared-folders you have to use maildirmake (which is part
> of courier-imap), perhaps with a combination of
> /usr/lib/courierimap/etc/maildirshared.
> How folders in your private namespace are displayed, depends on the MUA
> you are using. In Netscape this are all subfolders of "INBOX".
>
> But for further information you should look at man maildirmake or at the
> courier-mailing-list.
> I am quite happy with courier-imap and I would not recommend any other
> imapd with maildir-patches.
>
> Bye
> Georg
>
> Martin Jespersen schrieb:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My MUA is netscape messanger 4.73 for windows and i am not about to
change this so spare me any
> > rants about getting another MUA.
> >
> > I am currently using wu-imapd v4.7 with maildir patch, but i am not
quite satisfied with (the
> > maildir driver has a few missing features that are really anoying).
> >
> > So i am trying to get courier imapd 1.1 up and running, and it runs just
fine, but...
> >
> > It refused to create root-level subfolders and i can only create
subfolders under the INBOX.
> >
> > i have tried to reconfigure/reinstall 10 times now with and without
the --enable-workaround..
> >
> > i have even tried to modify the source code to use PRIVA as the personal
namespace instead of INBOX
> > (yeah i changed it everywhere and make check worked fine)
> >
> > but it is a no-go...
> >
> > maybe it would work if i completely rewrote the namespace structure of
courier-imapd and changed the
> > subfolder delimiter from "." to "/" like mh use since mh seems to work
fine except being super-slow
> > and outdated in alot of ways
> >
> > is there anyone who is succesfully running courier with support for
netscape out there?
> >
> > going through the sourcecode it seems that courier actually insists that
root-level folders should
> > reside under ./Maildir/ eg. the trashfolder is file-system wise created
as ./Maildir/Trash/
> >
> > can anyone answer me this: why? isn't this just begging for MUA
problems?
> >
> > *ARGH the pain!*
> >
> > if anyone knows of ANY imap server that supports Maildir format and
Netscape messanger at the same
> > time PLEASE tell me, because i am running out of ideas besides coding my
own imap server and i
> > really don't feel like doing that unless i absolutely have to (i hate
coding C -go figure :)
> >
> > if only perl was faster then i would make one today, but alas perl is no
good for production-level
> > daemons.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Martin Jespersen
>
> --
>
> Georg Lutz | http://www.erc.de
> ERC - Euro Regio Consult AG | Tel: +49 7854 9696-0
> Im Buehl 10 | Fax: +49 7854 9696-20
> D-77694 Kehl
Are you able to make it create folders on the same level as INBOX or
only as subfolders of INBOX?
/Martin
Tim Hunter wrote:
>
> I am using courier-imap with Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape Messenger,
> and Eudora, along with sqwebmail.
> It is a wonderful product.
>
> I don't have any problems, even with somewhere around 30 folders and
> subfolders.
> I have a good feeling you have misconfigured something.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Jespersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 2:22 PM
> To: Georg Lutz
> Cc: Qmail mailing list
> Subject: Re: OT: courier-imapd & netscape messanger for windows ==
> complete fuckup... any ideas?
>
> Hi Georg,
>
> Definition
>
> root-level folders = folders on the same level as the INBOX in the
> filesystem directory structure.
>
> Example:
>
> INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
> Trash == ~mylogin/Trash/
> Sent == ~mylogin/Sent/
>
> etc...
>
> I have made a Maildir folder under ~mylogin as ~mylogin/Maildir/ using
> maildirmake and there is no
> problem delivering to it or reading from it.
>
> The problem is this: Courier-imapd refuse to create root-level folders and
> insists that all folders
> should be created as subfolder of the INBOX folder.
>
> Example:
>
> INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
> Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/Trash/
> Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/Sent/
>
> Furthermore, since courier-imapd uses '.' as separator instead of the
> standard '/' that other
> Maildir-like message structures like Mh use all folders are created with a .
> infront.
>
> Example:
>
> INBOX == ~mylogin/Maildir/
> Trash == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Trash/
> Sent == ~mylogin/Maildir/.Sent/
>
> The problem basically seems to be that the guy who wrote courier-imapd is so
> hooked on the rfc's
> that he made a imap server that breakes all clients :( (or at least netscape
> messanger and microsoft
> outlook, which are used by the larger part of internet users as MUA)
>
> At first i thought that this was due to the silly choice of personal
> Namespace that he made, ie.
> INBOX which is a more or less reserved word in most MUA's.
>
> But although i patched the source to use PRIVA instead it still fucked up.
>
> So i guess it might be the '.' seperator that is the problem, though i am in
> know way knowledgable
> enough about the imap specs to base this on anything else than gut-feeling
> as a professional
> programmer of many years.
>
> But before i take on the task of making a complete working patch for courier
> imapd which supports
> standard MUA's i would like to be sure that no-one has done this before me,
> since i am hard pressed
> on time as it is, and actually need a good working imap server that supports
> Maildir now ;)
>
> I thought about contacting the guy who wrote it, but i must admit that after
> reading the FAQ and
> BUGS section on the download site i doubt very much that he in anyway cares
> about my problems since
> he seems to think that all MUA's that doesn't speak imap his way should be
> fixed *shrug*.
> That is an attitude that is hard to find usefull for the rest of us IMHO.
>
> Regards
>
> Martin Jespersen
>
> Georg Lutz wrote:
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > what do you mean by "root-level-folders" ?
> > With a MUA you can only create folders in your INBOX. If you want to
> > create public-shared-folders you have to use maildirmake (which is part
> > of courier-imap), perhaps with a combination of
> > /usr/lib/courierimap/etc/maildirshared.
> > How folders in your private namespace are displayed, depends on the MUA
> > you are using. In Netscape this are all subfolders of "INBOX".
> >
> > But for further information you should look at man maildirmake or at the
> > courier-mailing-list.
> > I am quite happy with courier-imap and I would not recommend any other
> > imapd with maildir-patches.
> >
> > Bye
> > Georg
> >
> > Martin Jespersen schrieb:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > My MUA is netscape messanger 4.73 for windows and i am not about to
> change this so spare me any
> > > rants about getting another MUA.
> > >
> > > I am currently using wu-imapd v4.7 with maildir patch, but i am not
> quite satisfied with (the
> > > maildir driver has a few missing features that are really anoying).
> > >
> > > So i am trying to get courier imapd 1.1 up and running, and it runs just
> fine, but...
> > >
> > > It refused to create root-level subfolders and i can only create
> subfolders under the INBOX.
> > >
> > > i have tried to reconfigure/reinstall 10 times now with and without
> the --enable-workaround..
> > >
> > > i have even tried to modify the source code to use PRIVA as the personal
> namespace instead of INBOX
> > > (yeah i changed it everywhere and make check worked fine)
> > >
> > > but it is a no-go...
> > >
> > > maybe it would work if i completely rewrote the namespace structure of
> courier-imapd and changed the
> > > subfolder delimiter from "." to "/" like mh use since mh seems to work
> fine except being super-slow
> > > and outdated in alot of ways
> > >
> > > is there anyone who is succesfully running courier with support for
> netscape out there?
> > >
> > > going through the sourcecode it seems that courier actually insists that
> root-level folders should
> > > reside under ./Maildir/ eg. the trashfolder is file-system wise created
> as ./Maildir/Trash/
> > >
> > > can anyone answer me this: why? isn't this just begging for MUA
> problems?
> > >
> > > *ARGH the pain!*
> > >
> > > if anyone knows of ANY imap server that supports Maildir format and
> Netscape messanger at the same
> > > time PLEASE tell me, because i am running out of ideas besides coding my
> own imap server and i
> > > really don't feel like doing that unless i absolutely have to (i hate
> coding C -go figure :)
> > >
> > > if only perl was faster then i would make one today, but alas perl is no
> good for production-level
> > > daemons.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Martin Jespersen
> >
> > --
> >
> > Georg Lutz | http://www.erc.de
> > ERC - Euro Regio Consult AG | Tel: +49 7854 9696-0
> > Im Buehl 10 | Fax: +49 7854 9696-20
> > D-77694 Kehl
On 15 Oct 2000, Chris K. Young wrote:
> Quoted from Peter Samuel:
> > - 911 is the emergency number in North America, while it is 000 in
> > Oz, 999 in NZ and UK etc.
>
> 999 in New Zealand? Not unless you use pulse dialling! :-) (Hint: most
> phones in New Zealand do tone dialling. And rotary phones in New Zealand
> are labelled backwards to what I've seen in other places.)
That's what confused me! I've not been in NZ since 1980 and I remember
that their emergency number was the hardest to dial on a rotary phone
(like Australia's 000), I'd forgotten that their rotary phones were
backwards, hence 111 is the hardest number to dial. (Or close to it).
>
> A New Zealand station (channel 2, I think) used to screen ``Rescue 911''
> (that American programme) on TV, and some kids actually dialled 911 in
> an emergency. :-( So since then, channel 2 had another series, ``Rescue
> 111''.
Similar problems in Oz.
--
Regards
Peter
----------
Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.e-smith.org (development) http://www.e-smith.com (corporate)
Phone: +1 613 368 4398 Fax: +1 613 564 7739
e-smith, inc. 1500-150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1P1 Canada
"If you kill all your unhappy customers, you'll only have happy ones left"
194.194.194.194 LAN
| |
mail----------INTERNET-----Firewall-----+--mail (192.168.0.2)
mydomain2.com +--mypc (192.168.0.3)
mydomain.com
I'm using a pop3 server on mail.mydomain2.com.
I'have received a message from mail.mydomain.com and
in the header message there are the following text lines:
Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([194.194.194.194])
by www (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9G9FZq12616
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:35 +0200
Received: (qmail 2553 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mypc) (192.168.0.3)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
by 192.168.0.2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 -0000
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
In the header appears the host name and the ip address
of the client sender and the internal ip address of the
qmail server (either protected by firewall).
How to scrub the private ip addresses from the header?
Thanks in advance for any help.
francesco
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:11:56PM +0200, Francesco Munaretto wrote:
> 194.194.194.194 LAN
> | |
> mail----------INTERNET-----Firewall-----+--mail (192.168.0.2)
> mydomain2.com +--mypc (192.168.0.3)
> mydomain.com
>
> I'm using a pop3 server on mail.mydomain2.com.
> I'have received a message from mail.mydomain.com and
> in the header message there are the following text lines:
>
> Received: from mail.mydomain.com ([194.194.194.194])
> by www (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9G9FZq12616
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:35 +0200
> Received: (qmail 2553 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO mypc) (192.168.0.3)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> by 192.168.0.2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 -0000
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ...
>
> In the header appears the host name and the ip address
> of the client sender and the internal ip address of the
> qmail server (either protected by firewall).
> How to scrub the private ip addresses from the header?
If you're using tcpserver, try putting this in your rules file:
192.168.0.:allow,TCPREMOTEHOST="",TCPREMOTEIP="",RELAYCLIENT=""
Chris
|
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I can't
make it work, and I'm getting crazy!
I have one domain only and, according to "vpopmail
administration guide", I want to set it as virtual
(in the nearest future there will be more than
one)
How should my /var/qmail/control/ files look like
now (one domain only)?
Thank you.
Marco
|
|
I need mail users not to be system users.
Is it possible anyway?
Ciao. Marco
If
you only have on domain then why do you want to use vpopmail? You should have
your one domain in the control/locals and rcpthosts file.
Shane
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I
can't make it work, and I'm getting crazy!
I have one domain only and, according to
"vpopmail administration guide", I want to set it as virtual
(in the nearest future there will be more than
one)
How should my /var/qmail/control/ files look
like now (one domain only)?
Thank you.
Marco
|
Hi All,
I've installed qmail using the maildir's; All is working well, but the
qmail-popup/pop3d combination is waiting a very long time (30-60 sec.) when
an external cliënt log's in...
They have no DNS and they work with DHCP addresses that are in a B-class
network...
I think it's trying to resolve the cliënts IP address which could take a
long time since it can never find it...
Thx in advance,
Jeroen.
hi,
if you use tcpserver try the -R and -H flag to avoid reverse dns and tcpremoteinfo
lookups
;) a
==============================================
Alexander Jernejcic
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs
I am a Signature, not a Virus!
end
==============================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeroen ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 7:25 PM
> To: Qmail mailing list
> Subject: qmail-pop3d
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've installed qmail using the maildir's; All is working well, but the
> qmail-popup/pop3d combination is waiting a very long time (30-60 sec.) when
> an external cliënt log's in...
> They have no DNS and they work with DHCP addresses that are in a B-class
> network...
>
> I think it's trying to resolve the cliënts IP address which could take a
> long time since it can never find it...
>
> Thx in advance,
> Jeroen.
>
>
>
qmail pop3 is launched with tcpd...
And it's the only service that's that slow, smtp is very fast...
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Jernejcic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 8:22 PM
To: Qmail mailing list
Subject: RE: qmail-pop3d
hi,
if you use tcpserver try the -R and -H flag to avoid reverse dns and
tcpremoteinfo lookups
;) a
==============================================
Alexander Jernejcic
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs
I am a Signature, not a Virus!
end
==============================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeroen ten Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 7:25 PM
> To: Qmail mailing list
> Subject: qmail-pop3d
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've installed qmail using the maildir's; All is working well, but the
> qmail-popup/pop3d combination is waiting a very long time (30-60 sec.)
when
> an external cliënt log's in...
> They have no DNS and they work with DHCP addresses that are in a B-class
> network...
>
> I think it's trying to resolve the cliënts IP address which could take a
> long time since it can never find it...
>
> Thx in advance,
> Jeroen.
>
>
>
brett randal: have you ever worked with fastforward???
if some users want to use fastforward and send mails to local and remote
users without .qmail files let them do it!!!!!
richard:
it works fine with fastforward to send mails to local and remote users:
if you want to get mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deliver it local to user
test2 und remote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] do the following steps:
- don´t add the domains "domain1.com" and "domain2.com" to
/var/qmail/control/locals !!!
- echo domain1.com >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
- echo domain1.com:alias >> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
- To activate /etc/aliases, put this line into ~alias/.qmail-default:
| fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb
- put the following line to /etc/aliases:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: test2, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- /var/qmail/bin/newaliases
- svc -t /service/qmail
now it should work :-)))
if you have problems with this ask me per mail
carsten
At 04:21 15.10.00, you wrote:
>Richard Sjögårdh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], user
> > where user is the local user who also want all mails delivered home.
>
>You may want to try using .qmail files if you want the mail to be
>delivered to the local user and a remote user. Try the following lines
>in the user's $HOME/.qmail
>
>&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>./Maildir/
>
>That will accomplish what you want. Basically, having an alias means
>that something that isn't real points to a place that is
>real. Sendmail's implementation, although the first, is stupid and
>incoherent. It doesn't even adhere to the real meaning of the word
>alias.
>
>If you have a lot like this (why? Why not just allow home users to
>pick up their mail via IMAP if they need access at home and work?),
>then you may want to whack up a quick perl or sed script to take care
>of it.
>--
>=======================================================
>|User: |Href: |Status: |
>-------------------------------------------------------
>|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
>=======================================================
> Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Carsten Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> brett randal: have you ever worked with fastforward???
Well, if you could read, my surname has 2 l's (randall). And yes, I
use fastforward extensively.
> if some users want to use fastforward and send mails to local and remote
> users without .qmail files let them do it!!!!!
> ...
> if you want to get mails for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and deliver it local to user
> test2 und remote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] do the following steps:
No, he said in the original e-mail that he would like to have the
following line in aliases:
user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], user
NOT
user: [EMAIL PROTECTED], anotheruser
>From his description, he wants an e-mail that is addressed to user to
be delivered to that SAME user locally (ie to their maildir), and to
another e-mail address elsewhere. That is the syntax and description
Richard gave, that is what I told him to use .qmail files
for. Sendmail's implementation of aliases, even though they invented
them, is wrong. It should theoretically create a loop, but it doesn't.
Richard, please clarify your question so we can help you properly.
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
"John Chronakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>qmail.org and qmail's author clearlly suggest to use tcpserver for
>qmail-smtpd and this is enough for me.
>
>But there is not any clear suggestion for using daemon tools instead
>of a superserver like xinetd (inetd is out of the question).
>In addition, the "install" file from the qmail source destribution
>has an example for using inetd to launch qmail-smtpd and pop3d.
qmail-smtpd can be served via inetd, xinetd, or tcpserver. The INSTALL
file suggested inetd because it used to be the preferred method. The
current recommendation is tcpserver from ucspi-tcp. I don't know how
well xinetd works with qmail, though. One thing you need is the
ability to set environment variables based on the IP address of the
remote system. If xinetd can do that--it's been years since I've
touched it--then it should work well with qmail.
>On the other hand qmail-howto, and allmost every othe document about
>qmail, are suggesting using daemon tools.
ucspi-tcp, not daemontools, although daemontools is also recommended.
>Friends of mine working as administrators in medium size ISPs, are
>suggesting to use qmail-smtpd and qmail-pop3d
>with xinetd like they do.
Why do they prefer it to tcpserver?
>All these different oppinions confused me.
It's better to have a confusing array of options than to be stuck with
a single frustrating utility.
>I just want to know the best way to control qmail since I am
>expecting a high number of mail users.
>What I am concerned is a reliable, stable and efficient mail delivery.
You can't go wrong with ucspi-tcp + daemontools.
-Dave
Subba Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have been using David Sill's qmail startup script until now. I started
>tweaking this script, since I have upgrade my distro. Now, I have all my
>qmail system setup the way it was.
>
>According to David's startup script, we would be using the "supervise" to
>run the tcpserver. These are the following directories that were created
>to support this script.
>
>/var/supervise/qmail/send
>/var/supervise/qmail/smtpd
>/var/log/qmail/send
>/var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
>What should be the owner.group settings for this directory be?
>
>The current settings are the following,
>
>drwxr-x--- 3 root qmail 4096 Aug 15 13:40 /var/supervise/
>drwxr-xr-x 6 qmaill qmail 4096 Aug 15 13:41 /var/log/qmail/
>
>When I start David's script, I get the following error messages.
>
>* Send Agent Started...
>multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
>* Network Agent Started...
>multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied
>Done.
/var/supervise needs to be readable/executable by other.
You may also need to check/adjust:
/
/var
/var/supervise/qmail
/var/supervise/qmail/send
/var/supervise/qmail/send/log
/var/supervise/qmail/smtp
/var/supervise/qmail/smtp/log
/var/log
/var/log/qmail
/var/log/qmail/send
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
-Dave
hello all, i set up qmail with mysql support, it seems to me
that all looks nice, but i problem i got, if i send a email to a
qmail adress, it nevers come to the mailbox !... and no denied or
error messages will be reply, so it looks like it's really sended, also
if i write a email from new qmail to qmail user, no failure messages come
but the messages are not in the box
i was looking on the faq, it seemds to me :like qmail procces (all 4 or 5
are active, like
qmail-spawn, clean,send ...) should all be startet, the Maildir is created
an right owned, the /qmail/rc script starts with the Maildir option.....
any ideas or knowledges ?.. .. thanks 4 all ...... mike
Hi guys,
I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that
email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to
postmaster.
Any ideias how I could achieve this?
The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this
/var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
/var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it.
And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid.
Thanks in advance
[]s
Davi
I would think it would be more like:
| /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
/home/postmaster/Maildir/
--
Tony Publiski
World Wide Net, Inc.
+1 (734) 513-7707 x 2012
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:08 PM
To: Qmail mailing list
Subject: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
Hi guys,
I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that
email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to
postmaster.
Any ideias how I could achieve this?
The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this
/var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
/var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it.
And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid.
Thanks in advance
[]s
Davi
But this way EVERY message will also goes to postmaster.
I dunno what's the return value of vdelivermail in a bounce, but depending
it all messages will go to postmaster, except the ones that bounced
(according to qmail-command man page)
Thanks Tony, but it doesn't work (I tried anyway).
[]s
Davi
Tony Publiski escritas:
> I would think it would be more like:
>
> | /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
> /home/postmaster/Maildir/
>
> --
> Tony Publiski
> World Wide Net, Inc.
> +1 (734) 513-7707 x 2012
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:08 PM
> To: Qmail mailing list
> Subject: Bounce-no-mailbox AND postmaster vpopmail delivery
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm using vpopmail and marketing people told (without asking me) that
> email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would bounce to sender AND delivered to
> postmaster.
> Any ideias how I could achieve this?
> The best one I had was a .qmail-default like this
>
> /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
> /var/qmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My vertical bar is broken, but I think you got it.
> And then filter identical messages. But it's quite stupid.
>
> Thanks in advance
> []s
> Davi
also sprach davi:
>
> But this way EVERY message will also goes to postmaster.
> I dunno what's the return value of vdelivermail in a bounce, but depending
> it all messages will go to postmaster, except the ones that bounced
> (according to qmail-command man page)
>From the vdelivermail man page:
_________________________________________________________________
RETURN VALUE
0 if all steps were successful. 100 if user is over quota or
bounce-no-mailbox is set and no matching user is found.
_________________________________________________________________
You can check the return code of vdelivermail for 100 and, if found, deliver
to the postmaster mailbox.
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
> I've hacked the Xaw3d library to give you a Win95 like interface and it
> is named Xaw95. You can replace your Xaw3d library.
Oh God, this is so disgusting!
(Seen on c.o.l.development.apps, about the "Win95 look-alike")
hi,
i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and
MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address.
any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated.
thanks,
pearse
"Robert Eric Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and
> MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address.
Set up your domain as a virtual domain. ie in
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains, put:
mydomain.com: user
Then add mydomain.com to /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts and
/var/qmail/control/locals, and restart qmail. You can then create
.qmail-postmaster, .qmail-root, etc files in ~user, or if you are
feeling really inventive, try fastforward with a bit of a modification
in the .qmail-default file so that undeliverable mails are delivered
to a maildir.
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
On 16-Oct-2000, Robert Eric Pearse wrote:
> i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and
> MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address.
> any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated.
Read about EXTENSION ADDRESSES in man dot-qmail. Hint: .qmail-default
Ronny
Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16-Oct-2000, Robert Eric Pearse wrote:
> > i want all mail sent to my server (except root, postmaster, abuse and
> > MAILER-DAEMON) to go to one address.
> > any suggestions on the best way to configure that would be appreciated.
>
> Read about EXTENSION ADDRESSES in man dot-qmail. Hint: .qmail-default
Doh! What was I thinking? :) Robert...forget what I said about virtual
domains, just use ~alias/.qmail-default to deliver to a maildir (but
still read man dot-qmail).
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
echo cliff > .qmail-default
/etc/init.d/svscan stop
/etc/init.d/svscan start
sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead of
going to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
am i missing something?
tia,
pearse
===================================================================
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at cliff.carorder.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This message is looping: it already has my Delivered-To line. (#5.4.6)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11048 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11045 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 -0000
Received: from mail.carorder.com (HELO notesapps.carorder.com)
(149.74.187.70)
by 216.34.168.210 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 22:15:51 -0000
Received: from jabroni ([149.74.14.145])
by notesapps.carorder.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.3)
with SMTP id 2000101617180356:2546 ;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:18:03 -0500
Message-ID: <009401c037be$fbc80ec0$910e4a95@jabroni>
From: "Robert Eric Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: test
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:18:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Apps/Carorder(Release 5.0.3 |March
21, 2000) at
10/16/2000 05:18:03 PM,
Serialize by Router on Apps/Carorder(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at
10/16/2000
05:18:05 PM,
Serialize complete at 10/16/2000 05:18:05 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
test
"Robert Eric Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> echo cliff > .qmail-default
> /etc/init.d/svscan stop
> /etc/init.d/svscan start
>
> sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead of
> going to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> am i missing something?
>
Look below:
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does that say? Is that how you spell cliff? My guess is you
misspelled in the echo line. Take a look.
> tia,
>
> pearse
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
ha!
thanks, man! ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett Randall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Eric Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: newbie question: forward (almost) all mail to one address
> "Robert Eric Pearse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > echo cliff > .qmail-default
> > /etc/init.d/svscan stop
> > /etc/init.d/svscan start
> >
> > sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it bounced like so instead
of
> > going to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > am i missing something?
> >
>
> Look below:
>
> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What does that say? Is that how you spell cliff? My guess is you
> misspelled in the echo line. Take a look.
>
> > tia,
> >
> > pearse
>
> --
> =======================================================
> |User: |Href: |Status: |
> -------------------------------------------------------
> |Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
> =======================================================
> Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Hi,
I have a system with qmail and ezmlm. I've created a user to manage all
the mailing lists we host, and set up the proper aliases for -subscribe
-unsubscribe and -help. However, I don't know how to set up the -get.xxx
aliases.
Any help?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a system with qmail and ezmlm. I've created a user to manage all
> the mailing lists we host, and set up the proper aliases for -subscribe
> -unsubscribe and -help. However, I don't know how to set up the -get.xxx
> aliases.
While I don't doubt that people on this list (not me) know how to do
this, this question should really be asked on the ezmlm mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral:
Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
what is meaning ? * thanks.....
"Mike A. Sauvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral:
> Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
>
>
> what is meaning ? * thanks.....
It means what it says...probably a case of the smtp server not
running. Try telnetting to port 25 of the machine you are trying to
send e-mail to. If it is one of your own machines, we can probably
help. If you are trying to send it somewhere else in the world, its
not your problem.
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
It my server, an im behind a firewall......
cu ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett Randall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike A. Sauvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: devlivery problem
"Mike A. Sauvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral:
> Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
>
>
> what is meaning ? * thanks.....
It means what it says...probably a case of the smtp server not
running. Try telnetting to port 25 of the machine you are trying to
send e-mail to. If it is one of your own machines, we can probably
help. If you are trying to send it somewhere else in the world, its
not your problem.
--
=======================================================
|User: |Href: |Status: |
-------------------------------------------------------
|Brett Randall |<http://xbox.ipsware.com/>|Hibernating|
=======================================================
Generated by Microsoft Ass-Watcher s/(c)/(!c)/g 2003
Timeout or rejection when trying establish a TCP connection to the remote
server.
Try it yourself with the telnet program and see if you can establish such a
connection. Chances are you can't. Doing so will allow you to tell if its
a no-route or no-data timeout or what.
The message comes from the last line in the main function of qmail-remote.c
- which I suspect only occurs when the attempts to connect time out.
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike A. Sauvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: devlivery problem
>
>
> Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33:
> deferral:
> Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
>
>
> what is meaning ? * thanks.....
>
"Mike A. Sauvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It my server, an im behind a firewall......
>
> cu ;)
Still not enough information about what you are trying to do
here. Anyway, I've answered your question...I've told you what the
error is. Maybe you just need to configure your firewall to allow port
25 requests through to your mail server, or you need to port forward
port 25. I don't know, depends what you are trying to do.
--
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
and it seems now to work, it was the smtp deamon, hasd an error
on the starting sequence..* thankss..*
.......................
Its my server, and im behind a firewall......
> Oct 17 01:52:15 srv-mail qmail: 971751135.337576 delivery 33: deferral:
> Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
>
>
> what is meaning ? * thanks.....
i set up qmail with mysql support, it seems to me
that all looks nice, but i problem i got, if i send a email to a
qmail adress, it nevers come to the mailbox !... and no denied or
error messages will be reply, so it looks like it's really sended, also
if i write a email from new qmail to qmail user, no failure messages come
but the messages are not in the box
i was looking on the faq, it seemds to me :like qmail procces (all 4 or 5
are active, like
qmail-spawn, clean,send ...) should all be startet, the Maildir is created
an right owned, the /qmail/rc script starts with the Maildir option.....
any ideas or knowledges ?.. .. thanks 4 all ...... mike
Are there rpm packages available for vpopmail and qmailadmin?
-Colin
[ send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe to the vpopmail
mailing list. ]
also sprach ch:
> Are there rpm packages available for vpopmail and qmailadmin?
No. A UID and GID is required at compile-time to build the vpopmail package.
Since there is no vpopmail RPM, I'm guessing that no one has gone through
the trouble of making one for qmailadmin.
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Footnotes are for things you believe don't really belong in LDP manuals,
but want to include anyway.
(Joel N. Weber II discussing the 'make' chapter of the Linux Programmer's
Guide)
A while back somebody mentioned in passing an add-on
that allowed connection limiting based on IP address.
I can't find it at on the webpage at qmail.org, or
in the FAQ or LWQ. I'm currently doing it with a
patched version of tcpserver, but would rather do it
the qmail way - anybody got a pointer?
Thanks,
Rick.
--
Rick Lyons
WebCentral
Dear qmail-ers,
I got a rather serious problem on our qmail server.
If we send from local (our domain) to local or
from remote to local, our qmail just works greatly.
But if we send email from local to remote address,
qmail send it very slowly (taking about 4 hours from
time that qmail issue "from ..." message to time that
qmail issue "to...." message.
Why can it be ?
Thanks for the help.
Best Regards,
Paulus Hendarwan
qmail Administrator
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
|
hi
i have install qmail and vpopmail.
i want to limit user's space.
how to do?
thank
|
hi
i have install qmail and vpopmail.
i want to convert username, password, letter from sendmail to
qmail.
how to do?
thanks!
|
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001017 05:40]:
> i have install qmail and vpopmail.
> i want to convert username, password, letter from sendmail to qmail.
> how to do?
man vconvert: Converting current user accounts
--
If you are too low a lifeform to be able to learn how to use the
manual page subsystem, why should we help you?
(Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Hello,
A new version of qmail-smtpd-auth patch has been released.
Changes:
- security fix - if your checkpassword crashed, attacker would get the relay
permission. Now it should work.
You can download it from the usual place:
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
NOTICE: this problam also affects users of Mrs.Brisby patch, so you should
consider upgrading (my patch has more features, is actively maintained and
is 100% backwards compatible).
Kris
