Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:54:48 CST:
> So you're basically saying that qmail can pretty much mung up an
> e-mail address any way it likes because it's...qmail!
No, he is not saying that at all. qmail out-of-the-box will not munge
anything. What that user was asking is clearly a case of user error
and misconfiguration. It has nothing to do with any RFCs whatsoever.
There is nothing to protect the user from telling qmail to do the Wrong
Thing(tm), just like there is nothing stopping the user from doing
"rm -rf /" when logged in as root.
> That seems to sum up the attitude around here: Qmail is great, don't
> dare question its merits.
I don't see that attitude at all---this problem is clearly not due to
qmail, but rather the way the user configures it.
> Sorry to obscure the issue with facts. I can see why qmail is still
> stuck at 1.03, given the support of folks like yourself.
That's not the reason why it is *stuck* at 1.03---what does free
support have to do with versioning of a program?!? You clearly have
obscured the issue with facts.
Andy
--
[-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------]
12:08pm up 10 days, 14:27, 4 users, load average: 2.40, 2.18, 1.73
