Henning Brauer writes: > I've implemented qmtp for all domains we are hosting (a lot), and according > to Russell, I was the first one ;-)) > > Even with implemneting this in our managemnt system and opening up the ports > in our firewalls it was less than half an hour of work, so qmail admins out > here: do it. Yup. It *is* terribly easy. And I've got a qmtp-savvy qmail-remote nearly coded up. Just a matter of figuring out how to report results back to qmail-rspawn. But I'm not going to release it until I get another ten qmtpd installation reports. No point, right? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | A steak, bacon Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | and cheese sandwich is 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | offensive to every major Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | religion.
- Re: qmtpd Alex Pennace
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Jurjen Oskam
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Dan Peterson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail James Raftery
- QMTP protocol spec question David L. Nicol
- Re: QMTP protocol spec question Peter van Dijk
- Re: QMTP protocol spec question Dan Peterson
- Re: QMTP protocol spec question Peter van Dijk
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Henning Brauer
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Mark Delany
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Roger Merchberger
- Re: thoughts for future qmail David Benfell
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail David Benfell
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Timothy Legant
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Charles Cazabon
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Johan Almqvist
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Henning Brauer
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson