On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:16:45AM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Johan Almqvist writes:
> > Quoting http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
>
> Don't believe everything you read. :-)
>
> My original design made QMTP-only mail exchangers easier but made
> QMTP+SMTP mail exchangers harder. This was a bad tradeoff.
>
> Clients should interpret a QMTP priority as ``try QMTP, then try SMTP.''
Which is my interpretation of part of the spec, but another part
contradicts this.
> Then a typical SMTP host that adds QMTP support can keep its single MX
> record but change the priority.
Could you please revise the spec?
Greetz, Peter.
