Chris Garrigues wrote: > > "Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does; > > patches are often released to fix bugs. > > How about "addition" or "extension"? we need something that vaguely impugns the patch, without implying that the patch is required, and we wish to keep current meaning of "patch" and be consistent with all current habits. My nomination is, drumroll please "non-standard option" or , even more impugnly, "unsupported option" These could even be ranked in order of sanity, from the ones that get mentioned all the time on the list, to the ones that are heretical to "official" reccommendations. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Live fast, die young, and leave a beautiful corpse"
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Scott Gifford
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Felix von Leitner
- Re: A firestorm of protest? David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Chris Garrigues
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Dave Sill
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Tony Campisi
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Robin S. Socha
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jonathan J. Smith
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Dave Sill
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: A firestorm of protest? David L. Nicol
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Greg Cope
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jerry Lynde
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Henning Brauer
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Erwin Hoffmann
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Jurjen Oskam
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Greg Owen
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Andrew Richards
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Martin Randall
- RE: A firestorm of protest? Laurence Brockman
- Re: A firestorm of protest? Robin S. Socha