Peter Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Dave Sill wrote: >> >> Here's a possible fix. In control/virtualdomains: >> >> [0.0.0.0]:alias-devnull >> >> And in ~alias/.qmail-devnull-default >> >> # >> >> Which should throw away all mail to MX's resolving to 0.0.0.0. > >Are you sure that will work? Nope. That's why it's a "possible fix". I didn't have a handy "resolves to 0.0.0.0" domain name to test. >The envelope details won't mention >0.0.0.0, so how will qmail-send know to use that entry in >virtualdomains. Beats me. :-) >(I haven't tested it yet, but I'm about to). Let us know... -Dave
- Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1 Scott Gifford
- Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1 Charles Cazabon
- Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1 Charles Cazabon
- Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX rec... Keary Suska
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling a... Matt Brown
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handl... Dave Sill
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: H... Peter Samuel
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was R... Dave Sill
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: H... Peter Samuel
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handl... Scott Gifford