On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 12:20:37PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Edward J. Allen III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > There is nothing wrong with incorporating common patches into the
> > distribution.  This is how open source development works.
> 
> qmail is not open source.  It does not obey condition 3 of the Open
> Source Definition:
>     http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.html

Open Source is something else than open source.

qmail is open source.

qmail is not Open Source.

Please do not respond, this subject has been discussed over and over.

Greetz, Peter.

Reply via email to