qmail Digest 27 Mar 2001 11:00:00 -0000 Issue 1316
Topics (messages 59696 through 59785):
procmail
59696 by: MOkondo
59697 by: Kirill Miazine
59701 by: pratibha
59702 by: pratibha
59761 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59763 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59773 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59781 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
qmail+ldap
59698 by: Luka Gerzic
59703 by: Henning Brauer
59744 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59750 by: Henning Brauer
59753 by: Ricardo Cerqueira
59757 by: Henning Brauer
59762 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
forward mail from one domain to another.
59699 by: Iñigo Martínez Lasala
59705 by: Charles Cazabon
59708 by: Iñigo Martínez Lasala
59710 by: Charles Cazabon
59760 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59764 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
Re: quota message...
59700 by: Robert Sander
59768 by: teng.materials.gov.cn
59783 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
Re: Sending attachments with qmail-inject
59704 by: Charles Cazabon
59766 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59767 by: Todd Goldenbaum
Re: lost??
59706 by: Tom Beer
59769 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
Re: Qmail + pop3d
59707 by: Bill Andersen
Re: redundant mail servers
59709 by: Markus Stumpf
Using DRAC with qmail?
59711 by: Steven Katz
VERP message handling
59712 by: Alex Kramarov
Multi RCPT
59713 by: Iñigo Martínez Lasala
59715 by: Charles Cazabon
59717 by: Alex Kramarov
59718 by: Charles Cazabon
59720 by: Alex Kramarov
moving from post.office to qmail
59714 by: bmcalpine.macconnect.com
Logging
59716 by: Jeremy Suo-Anttila
59721 by: nolan.celery.tssi.com
Symbolic link to datemail?
59719 by: Matt Simonsen
59722 by: Charles Cazabon
59723 by: Matt Simonsen
59724 by: Charles Cazabon
59725 by: Ricardo Cerqueira
59726 by: Ricardo Cerqueira
59727 by: Matt Simonsen
59728 by: Matt Simonsen
59729 by: Matt Simonsen
59730 by: Timothy Mayo
59731 by: Matt Simonsen
59732 by: Ian Lance Taylor
59733 by: Timothy Mayo
how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 under tcpserver?
59734 by: Linux!audimed
59736 by: Charles Cazabon
59737 by: tc lewis
59746 by: Henning Brauer
alias
59735 by: The Beast
59759 by: Greg White
59778 by: namery
ok .ok I answer myself excuse me please. RE: how can i run qmail on a port that is not
25
59738 by: Lucas
Taking too long logging via POP
59739 by: Neafevoc K. Marindale
59742 by: Olivier M.
59743 by: Charles Cazabon
59749 by: Henning Brauer
Re: forward
59740 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59741 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59745 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
59775 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59776 by: Brett Randall
59777 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
59779 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
Delivered Messages staying in queue
59747 by: Bill Crowley
59748 by: Mark Delany
59751 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
59752 by: Peter van Dijk
59754 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
59755 by: Mark Delany
Re: I am confused the use of defaulthost and envnoathost
59756 by: Uong, Hoang D
can't send remotely
59758 by: Brett
About Quota
59765 by: inter7.mail.delanet.com
postings messed up
59770 by: Kirill Miazine
qmail and sms
59771 by: Essy Ren
Re: local mail routing help
59772 by: Jean
serial mail
59774 by: lkhanna.hughes-ecomm.com
Tcpserver
59780 by: Sumith
59782 by: Robin S. Socha
Secondary SMTP-server
59784 by: Andreas Grip
59785 by: James Raftery
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am trying to filter email using procmail.
what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
| preline procmail
The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
my question is:
How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
--
MOkondo
i am an atheist, thank god !
* MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 21:21]:
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
Read man procmail, there's an environment variable that tells what do do with
all mail after all rules has been completed and none of them matched.
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
--
Kirill
With best regards,
Shishir K. Singh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: procmail
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
>
With best regards,
Shishir K. Singh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: procmail
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
>
I am trying to filter email using procmail.
what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
| preline procmail
The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
my question is:
How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
--
MOkondo
i am an atheist, thank god !
* MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 21:21]:
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
Read man procmail, there's an environment variable that tells what do do with
all mail after all rules has been completed and none of them matched.
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
--
Kirill
With best regards,
Shishir K. Singh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: procmail
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
>
With best regards,
Shishir K. Singh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: MOkondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:51 PM
Subject: procmail
> I am trying to filter email using procmail.
> what i was doing put a line below on ~/.qmail file:
>
> | preline procmail
>
> The result is filtered emails delivered to ~/Mail/anyfile (one file)
> but unfiltered email delivered to /var/spool/mail/
>
> my question is:
> How to make procmail work with Maildir and as reliable as Maildir?
> what i have to write on ~/.qmail file ?
>
> --
> MOkondo
> i am an atheist, thank god !
>
if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
please send me email.
With regards
Gerzic Z. Luka
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:59:48PM +0200, Luka Gerzic wrote:
> if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
> please send me email.
Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/.
If there are questions left after reading the whole document at least 2
times use the appropriate list.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
please send me email.
With regards
Gerzic Z. Luka
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:59:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
> please send me email.
How often again? In capital letters:
READ HTTP://WWW.LIFEWITHQMAIL.ORG/LDAP/
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:48:32AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:59:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
> > please send me email.
>
> How often again? In capital letters:
>
> READ HTTP://WWW.LIFEWITHQMAIL.ORG/LDAP/
*grin*
The requested URL /LDAP/ was not found on this server.
Better create an Alias to /ldap/ called /LDAP/, just in case :)
RC
P.S. - Shouting is no solution for clueless people. Flaming them is much
more fun :)
--
+-------------------
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42
| Novis Telecom - Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica
| Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 2 1010 0000 - Fax: +351 2 1010 4459
PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:16:46AM +0100, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:48:32AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:59:48PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
> > > please send me email.
> >
> > How often again? In capital letters:
> >
> > READ HTTP://WWW.LIFEWITHQMAIL.ORG/LDAP/
>
> *grin*
> The requested URL /LDAP/ was not found on this server.
>
> Better create an Alias to /ldap/ called /LDAP/, just in case :)
If I remeber after being back from CeBIt I'll do so - but both notebook's and
mobile's batteries are getting emtpy :-((
> RC
>
> P.S. - Shouting is no solution for clueless people. Flaming them is much
> more fun :)
OK, next time Flaming ;-))
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:59:48PM +0200, Luka Gerzic wrote:
> if someone had any expirience with qmail and openldap
> please send me email.
Read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/.
If there are questions left after reading the whole document at least 2
times use the appropriate list.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
We have several domains. We would want to receive in the same mailbox mail
for several domains.
For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Manager
newKnow
Navaluenga 2, Las Rozas, Madrid, Spain
+34 91 6399000
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have several domains. We would want to receive in the same mailbox mail
> for several domains.
> For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If domain1.dom is a local domain, just make domain2.dom a local domain as
well. If domain1.dom is a virtualdomain, make domain2.dom another virtual
domain controlled by the same local user account as domain1.dom. Done.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
domain2.dom is a virtualdomain.
The problem is that no user has it's mailbox in this server. This is a
forward-only server.
I've two posibilities:
- let forward server "convert" @domain2.dom to @domain1.dom or...
- let destination server manage both domains. But since destination server
is a MSExchange (without internet connectivity, of course) I should make
user per user conversion. :(
I would prefer use the first method.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: lunes, 26 de marzo de 2001 16:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: forward mail from one domain to another.
>
>
> Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have several domains. We would want to receive in the
> same mailbox mail
> > for several domains.
> > For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be forwarded to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If domain1.dom is a local domain, just make domain2.dom a
> local domain as
> well. If domain1.dom is a virtualdomain, make domain2.dom
> another virtual
> domain controlled by the same local user account as
> domain1.dom. Done.
>
> Charles
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Charles Cazabon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPL'ed software available at:
> http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
> Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We have several domains. We would want to receive in the same mailbox
> > > mail for several domains. For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be
> > > forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > If domain1.dom is a local domain, just make domain2.dom a local domain as
> > well. If domain1.dom is a virtualdomain, make domain2.dom another virtual
> > domain controlled by the same local user account as domain1.dom. Done.
>
> domain2.dom is a virtualdomain. The problem is that no user has it's mailbox
> in this server. This is a forward-only server. I've two posibilities: - let
> forward server "convert" @domain2.dom to @domain1.dom or... - let
> destination server manage both domains. But since destination server is a
> MSExchange (without internet connectivity, of course) I should make user per
> user conversion. :( I would prefer use the first method.
I don't see the problem. Just make domain2.dom a copy of domain1.dom. i.e. if
you're using a default forwarding rule in an ~alias/.qmail-default file for
domain1.dom, make a copy of it, or symlink to it, for domain2.dom. If you're
controlling domain1.dom with a system account foo, just make domain2.dom
controlled by the same system account foo, and it will get handled the
same way as domain1.dom.
Rewriting headers to hide one domain from another is a broken design, and is
a sendmail-ism.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have several domains. We would want to receive in the same mailbox mail
for several domains.
For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Manager
newKnow
Navaluenga 2, Las Rozas, Madrid, Spain
+34 91 6399000
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have several domains. We would want to receive in the same mailbox mail
> for several domains.
> For example, all mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] be forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If domain1.dom is a local domain, just make domain2.dom a local domain as
well. If domain1.dom is a virtualdomain, make domain2.dom another virtual
domain controlled by the same local user account as domain1.dom. Done.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On 26 Mar 2001 12:08:29 +0200,
ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How I can set quota message for qmail ?
>Can you help me?
When You have filesystem quotas, use warnquota.
Greetings
--
Robert Sander
Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG
Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24
+493024345330 10435 Berlin
Hello all,
Monday, March 26, 2001, 8:05:38 PM, you wrote:
RS> On 26 Mar 2001 12:08:29 +0200,
RS> ONE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>How I can set quota message for qmail ?
>>Can you help me?
RS> When You have filesystem quotas, use warnquota.
RS> Greetings
but I want to know are there some way to use quota without filesystem
quota?and want to set quota for a domain!can i?
thanks
my english is pool.sorry.
--
Best regards,
teng mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all...
How I can set quota message for qmail ?
Can you help me?
Thank you
cmail
Todd Goldenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Install mutt. Then just do the following, to create MIME-type file
> > attachments:
> >
> > echo "This is the message body.
> > It can have multiple lines." \
> > | mutt -a /path/to/file1 -a /path/to/file2 recipient1 recipient2 ...
>
> wow, and then if qmail is installed i guess that's what mutt would use to
> actually send it?
Yes. For additional flexibility, you can configure Mutt (in /etc/Muttrc,
or ~/.muttrc) with "set envelope_from=yes", to set the envelope sender address
from the contents of the From: header.
As another poster noted, you can also explicitly set the sendmail mutt
variable to be qmail-inject as well.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Goldenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Install mutt. Then just do the following, to create MIME-type file
> > attachments:
> >
> > echo "This is the message body.
> > It can have multiple lines." \
> > | mutt -a /path/to/file1 -a /path/to/file2 recipient1 recipient2 ...
>
> wow, and then if qmail is installed i guess that's what mutt would use to
> actually send it?
Yes. For additional flexibility, you can configure Mutt (in /etc/Muttrc,
or ~/.muttrc) with "set envelope_from=yes", to set the envelope sender address
from the contents of the From: header.
As another poster noted, you can also explicitly set the sendmail mutt
variable to be qmail-inject as well.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow, thanks. The MIME::Tools module is fantastic. I'd highly recommend it
to anyone in a similar situation- for sending or receiving attachment-laden
email w/perl + qmail.
todd
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:16:44PM -0500, Todd Goldenbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using perl to construct and send qmail messages, and I've found it very
> > easy with qmail-inject. But I'm confused about attachments... I found this
> > suggestion from the archives of this list:
>
> Did you try MIME::Tools? Check your nearest CPAN mirror for more info. Or
> run following:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e 'readme("MIME::Tools")'
>
> >
> > % cat {filename} | uuencode {filename} | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > however, when the mail comes in, it looks something like this:
> >
> > Date: 24 Mar 2001 02:06:32 -0000
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> >
> > begin 664 ngc2903_hst_big.jpg
> > M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````4```_^X`#D%D
> > M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0``@("`@("`@("`@,"`@(#!`,"`@,$!00$!`0$!08%
> > M!04%!04&!@<'"`<'!@D)"@H)"0P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`$#`P,%!`4)!@8)
> > M#0L)"PT/#@X.#@\/#`P,#`P/#PP,#`P,#`\,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,#`P,
> > M#`P,#`P,#`P,_\``$0@%W@7&`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`:(````'`0$!`0$`````
> > M`````
> >
> > I'm not very familiar with the standard email spec, but it seems like there
> > might be a way to just include a line in the email header that indicates
> > a file in the local filesystem to attach, maybe assumiing it's been uuencoded?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Todd
> >
> --
> Kirill
>
start from /usr/src _and_ you may read life with qmail
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Malsack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: lost??
Hello,
Why does my sco unix odt system 5 come back and tell me that there is no
cc found in $PATH after typing in ./configure?
Thank you for your anticipated assistance.
Gregory Malsack
Technical Sales & Service Manager
Data Direct Distributors
start from /usr/src _and_ you may read life with qmail
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Malsack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: lost??
Hello,
Why does my sco unix odt system 5 come back and tell me that there is no
cc found in $PATH after typing in ./configure?
Thank you for your anticipated assistance.
Gregory Malsack
Technical Sales & Service Manager
Data Direct Distributors
Keith,
Although the directories MAY be on a separate logial partitions
(I used Red Hat 7's auto partition, so I can't say exactly how
RH7 does it), they are NOT, however, on two physical Hard Drives.
I only have one 3 Meg drive in the machine. Also, I can copy
the file manually with the "mv" command without the error (?).
The only time I get the error is when I call one of the "elq",
"qail" or "pinq" wrappers.
I agree with you on Mutt. I think I will just stick with Mutt.
As you said, it is very feature rich - just a little cryptic!
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: ennui [mailto:ennui]On Behalf Of Nick (Keith) Fish
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 5:39 PM
To: Bill Andersen; Qmail Mailing List
Subject: Re: Qmail + pop3d
Bill Andersen wrote:
>
> I read the docs and found the nice little wrappers for "elq","pinq" and
> "qail",
> but I always get the following error when it calls the maildir2mbox
> command...
>
> maildir2mbox: fatal: unable to move /home/bill/Mailtmp to
> /var/spool/mail/bill:
> cross-device link
>
> I'm a Linux newbie, so I just went to POP3 from my PC in order to get my
> mail.
> However, I would really like to run pine. (I did get Mutt working with
> maildir,
> so I'me not completely locked to my PC!!! Thank goodness)
>
> I'm sure it's obvious what I have wrong to someone who knows *nix...
>
> Help anyone?
>
> Bill
Well, are those directories on separate devices (i.e. two different hard
drives)? If so (and this is judging from the error message), that's
probably your problem. Try copying the Maildir over to the var
directory somewhere and then run the maildir2mbox command.
BTW, if I was you, I would just stick with mutt and Maildir. Maildir is
by far the best format for storing e-mail to date and mutt is an
excellent and featureful MUA, although syntax can be a bitch. My second
recommendation would be to download the patch to make Pine work with
Maildir. What you're trying to do, I would call a distant third.
Power to ya, though.
---
Keith
Network Engineer
Triton Technologies, Inc.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:02:13AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> You use POP3 when you want to get the email the hell off your
> servers.
Anyone else noticing a heavy growth in "Keep eMails on Server" settings
in POP3 ? :(((
> You use IMAP when you want to have a mail expiration policy,
*smile* thanks to Maildirs this has become easy with POP3, too ;-)
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen
asleep yet.
Hi,
I'm trying to get DRAC to work with qmail. Does anyone know where I
can find instructions for setting up the maps in qmail's SMTP daemon
to check the DRAC db?
Thanks,
Steven
Hello.
I am trying to setup automatic bounce handling for mailing list ,where the
messages are injected to qmail by smtp, one by one - customised messages for
every recipient, with the correct smtp envelope for VERP, and the address
list is extracted from a database before the list is being sent (it's an
announcement list for a product, where users subscribe via the web, not a
kind of list that would work with ezmlm, if I understand it correctly).
I was trying to figure, what is the best way to collect all the addresses
returned to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and the first thing that came to me is
putting
| perl -e '$ret_address=$ENV{'LOCAL'};$ret_address=~s/.*-.*-// ;
$ret_address=~s/=/@/; print $ret_address."\n";' >> listname-bounce.log
all in one line.
The only think that worries me with this solution, is what will happen when
two processes will try to write to the file - I don't mind garbling a few
rows, as long as it doesn't affect everything else.
Is there a better/more efficient/more compatible to the future way to do
that?
Thanks.
Alex.
Is there any working and fully tested implementation for multi RCTP? (that
is to send a mail to several receipts in the same connection and sending
only once this mail).
Thanks in advance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Manager
newKnow
Navaluenga 2, Las Rozas, Madrid, Spain
+34 91 6399000
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any working and fully tested implementation for multi RCTP? (that
> is to send a mail to several receipts in the same connection and sending
> only once this mail).
Yes. It's called serialmail. See djb's site for details.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, the way I see it (and tested it) , it doesn't provide the required
solution :
The only scenario that remotely fits for this is to use serialmail to send
all outgoing mail to ISP from a maildir, and all outgoing mail is routed
through virtual domain to that maildir. But this doesn't reduce the
bandwidth consumed : if a message is intended for 3 recipients, even in the
same domain, you will find 3 copies of the mail in that mailbox, so you
didn't save anything.
Alex.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail list (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: Multi RCPT
> Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any working and fully tested implementation for multi RCTP?
(that
> > is to send a mail to several receipts in the same connection and sending
> > only once this mail).
>
> Yes. It's called serialmail. See djb's site for details.
>
> Charles
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
> Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Alex Kramarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Iñigo Martínez Lasala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there any working and fully tested implementation for multi RCTP?
> > > (that is to send a mail to several receipts in the same connection and
> > > sending only once this mail).
> >
> > Yes. It's called serialmail. See djb's site for details.
>
> No, the way I see it (and tested it) , it doesn't provide the required
> solution :
>
> The only scenario that remotely fits for this is to use serialmail to send
> all outgoing mail to ISP from a maildir, and all outgoing mail is routed
> through virtual domain to that maildir. But this doesn't reduce the bandwidth
> consumed : if a message is intended for 3 recipients, even in the same
> domain, you will find 3 copies of the mail in that mailbox, so you didn't
> save anything.
No, it can be made to work the way the original poster wanted -- that's
one of the main reasons for serialmail's existence. I don't use it myself,
but do recall djb posting exact instructions for using serialmail to do
multi-RCPT delivery over SMTP.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Charles Cazabon" wrote
> No, it can be made to work the way the original poster wanted -- that's
> one of the main reasons for serialmail's existence. I don't use it
myself,
> but do recall djb posting exact instructions for using serialmail to do
> multi-RCPT delivery over SMTP.
>From what I remember, the original intention was that the user will put his
outgoung mail to a maildir and serialmail will pick it up from there (and in
this case, one mail sent to several recipients will stay as one mail). But
in our case (and 99% of others, i believe) the person is talking about 30-40
users, and datatytes configuration, which clearly state that the mail
arrives to qmail server through smtp.
Hey there,
I am looking to migrate several thousand mail accounts from post.office to
qmail. Are there any conversion scripts for this or an easy way to get this
done that someone knows about?
TIA
Brendan
I would like to be able to log all subscriptions and un-subscriptions on my
list. right now it is a basic ezmlm-idx list on a freebsd 4.1 box. I tried
to look thru the .qmail files to see if I could add my email address to one
of them but I could not find the one that handles the unsub/sub commands.
any help with this would be appreciated.
Thanks
Jeremy Suo-Anttila
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://funeralWire.com
Your Leading Source For Death Care Industry News.
> I would like to be able to log all subscriptions and un-subscriptions on my
> list. right now it is a basic ezmlm-idx list on a freebsd 4.1 box. I tried
> to look thru the .qmail files to see if I could add my email address to one
> of them but I could not find the one that handles the unsub/sub commands.
>
> any help with this would be appreciated.
ezmlm-idx already logs all subscriptions and unsubscriptions in the Log files.
Below is a short perl program that will list all of the activity in the past
week.
--
Mike Nolan
#!/usr/bin/perl
$[=1; # array base
$\="\n";
$,="";
$today=time;
#print $today;
open (FILES, "ls -lt /var/qmail/alias/*/Log /var/qmail/alias/*/*/Log|");
#$_=<FILES>;
#chop;
#print $_;
while (<FILES>) {
chop;
#print $_;
@Fld = split(' ', $_, 9999);
$file = $Fld[9];
open (MSG, "tail $Fld[9]|");
while (<MSG>) {
chop;
#print $_;
@Fld = split(' ', $_, 9999);
($sec,$min,$hour,$mday, $mon, $year, $wday, $yday, $isdt)
= localtime($Fld[1]);
$x=$_;
if ($Fld[1] > $today -609000) {
if (length($file) > 5) {
print substr($file,18);
undef $file;
}
print " ", $mon+1,"/",$mday, "/", $year+1900, " ", $hour, ":",
substr($min+100,2), " ",
$Fld[2], " ", $Fld[3];
}
} #end of Log file
} #end of list of log file names
exit;
First, the problem: we need to send email from our Qmail server using
standard time instead of GMT.
I found a solution to this problem from Dave Sill saying to use datemail...
He says that, "Some people even replace qmail-inject with a symbolic link to
datemail" This is the solution we really need, that is, one where we can
continue to use the qmail-inject command. At this point I have tried both a
symbolic link and actually copying datemail to qmail-inject, but we continue
to get the error message:
[root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
sendmail: illegal option -- H
sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
arg ... ]
My datemail file contains:
#!/bin/sh
# WARNING: This file was auto-generated. Do not edit!
exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Matt Simonsen
Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the problem: we need to send email from our Qmail server using
> standard time instead of GMT.
The right solution is to have your MUA (or your users' MUAs) insert a
Date: header before passing the mail on to qmail. qmail will then leave
it alone, and it will be in whatever timezone you want.
However...
> I found a solution to this problem from Dave Sill saying to use datemail...
> He says that, "Some people even replace qmail-inject with a symbolic link to
> datemail" This is the solution we really need, that is, one where we can
> continue to use the qmail-inject command. At this point I have tried both a
> symbolic link and actually copying datemail to qmail-inject, but we continue
> to get the error message:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- H
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
A sendmail error when calling qmail-inject? Something is screwy. What
does `ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject` output? It looks like your
qmail-inject is a symlink to either the qmail sendmail wrapper, or a real
sendmail binary (can't recall enough about the error messages each gives
to determine which).
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, there is no MUA since qmail-inject is being called from
various scripts. Here's the output you requested, Charles.
[root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
datemail
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 34748 Mar 19 10:44 qmail-inject.orig
And the problem again...
[root@wrapguy bin]# ./datemail
sendmail: illegal option -- a
sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
arg ... ]
And one more potentially useful ls is:
[root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep datemail
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 126 Mar 19 10:44 datemail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
datemail
Thanks for all the help! I really am stumpted on this one.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail?
Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the problem: we need to send email from our Qmail server using
> standard time instead of GMT.
The right solution is to have your MUA (or your users' MUAs) insert a
Date: header before passing the mail on to qmail. qmail will then leave
it alone, and it will be in whatever timezone you want.
However...
> I found a solution to this problem from Dave Sill saying to use
datemail...
> He says that, "Some people even replace qmail-inject with a symbolic link
to
> datemail" This is the solution we really need, that is, one where we can
> continue to use the qmail-inject command. At this point I have tried both
a
> symbolic link and actually copying datemail to qmail-inject, but we
continue
> to get the error message:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- H
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
A sendmail error when calling qmail-inject? Something is screwy. What
does `ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject` output? It looks like your
qmail-inject is a symlink to either the qmail sendmail wrapper, or a real
sendmail binary (can't recall enough about the error messages each gives
to determine which).
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is no MUA since qmail-inject is being called from
> various scripts. Here's the output you requested, Charles.
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
> datemail
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 34748 Mar 19 10:44 qmail-inject.orig
Okay, this looks alright.
[...]
> And one more potentially useful ls is:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep datemail
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 126 Mar 19 10:44 datemail
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
> datemail
Yes, this seems funny. Datemail here is a 67-byte Bourne shell script:
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /usr/sbin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
My questions:
1) What are the contents of your datemail? It's got to be more than here.
2) How much do you want to bet that /usr/sbin/sendmail on your system
is not the qmail sendmail wrapper, but a real sendmail binary? That's
almost certainly the problem here, and would account for the sendmail
error messages you're seeing. If this is the problem, you need to remove
the sendmail binary (or rename it) and replace it with a link to
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail .
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:54:20AM -0800, Matt Simonsen wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is no MUA since qmail-inject is being called from
> various scripts. Here's the output you requested, Charles.
>
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
> datemail
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 34748 Mar 19 10:44 qmail-inject.orig
>
>
> And the problem again...
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ./datemail
> sendmail: illegal option -- a
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
Strange... Try running this by hand:
"/var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail"
What do you get? The same error? The above line is what datemail does.
RC
--
+-------------------
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42
| Novis Telecom - Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica
| Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 2 1010 0000 - Fax: +351 2 1010 4459
PGP signature
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, this seems funny. Datemail here is a 67-byte Bourne shell script:
>
Actually... I'm running a pristine qmail 1.03 on this machine... datemail
is a 126 byte bash script, using /var/qmail/bin/sendmail instead of
/usr/bin/sendmail. Considering the size, I'd say his script is exactly the
same.
RC
>
> 1) What are the contents of your datemail? It's got to be more than here.
A comment: "# WARNING: This file was auto-generated. Do not edit!" :-)
>
> 2) How much do you want to bet that /usr/sbin/sendmail on your system
> is not the qmail sendmail wrapper, but a real sendmail binary? That's
> almost certainly the problem here, and would account for the sendmail
> error messages you're seeing. If this is the problem, you need to remove
> the sendmail binary (or rename it) and replace it with a link to
> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail .
That might be it... But then again, if his script is the original one (like
mine, apperently created by "make setup"...)
RC
--
+-------------------
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42
| Novis Telecom - Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica
| Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal
| Tel: +351 2 1010 0000 - Fax: +351 2 1010 4459
PGP signature
Yeah, my script is the one with the added comment....
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Cerqueira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail?
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, this seems funny. Datemail here is a 67-byte Bourne shell script:
>
Actually... I'm running a pristine qmail 1.03 on this machine... datemail
is a 126 byte bash script, using /var/qmail/bin/sendmail instead of
/usr/bin/sendmail. Considering the size, I'd say his script is exactly the
same.
>Strange... Try running this by hand:
>
>"/var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail"
>
>What do you get? The same error? The above line is what datemail does.
Here it is:
[root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -t
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing
test from wrapguy...
And it worked perfectly while qmail-inject was the standard file. It gave
the below error as soon as I replaced qmail-inject with datemail.
So, to reiterate, here's the problem. When I run the datemail script it
works perfectly, too. But when I add a symbolic link or replace the file
qmail-inject with datemail I get an error. Here's a series of commands that
should clearly show what I mean:
[root@wrapguy bin]# cp datemail qmail-inject
cp: overwrite `qmail-inject'? y
[root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
sendmail: illegal option -- a
sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
arg ... ]
[root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72 Mar 26 11:35 qmail-inject
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34748 Mar 26 11:22 qmail-inject.orig
[root@wrapguy bin]# cat qmail-inject
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
[root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
sendmail: illegal option -- a
sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
arg ... ]
Thanks for the help, all-
Matt
After my previous emails, I think it's safe to assume that #1 has been
answered... I believe my datemail script is OK.
As to #2, my symbolic links all point correctly to qmail-inject...
[root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l /usr/lib/sendmail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 19 11:12 /usr/lib/sendmail ->
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail
[root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 19 11:12
/usr/sbin/sendmail -> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
I *really* wish that were the problem....
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail?
Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is no MUA since qmail-inject is being called from
> various scripts. Here's the output you requested, Charles.
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
> datemail
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 34748 Mar 19 10:44 qmail-inject.orig
Okay, this looks alright.
[...]
> And one more potentially useful ls is:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep datemail
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root qmail 126 Mar 19 10:44 datemail
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Mar 26 10:48 qmail-inject ->
> datemail
Yes, this seems funny. Datemail here is a 67-byte Bourne shell script:
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /usr/sbin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
My questions:
1) What are the contents of your datemail? It's got to be more than here.
2) How much do you want to bet that /usr/sbin/sendmail on your system
is not the qmail sendmail wrapper, but a real sendmail binary? That's
almost certainly the problem here, and would account for the sendmail
error messages you're seeing. If this is the problem, you need to remove
the sendmail binary (or rename it) and replace it with a link to
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail .
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot replace qmail-inject with a symlink to datemail. datemail uses
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail which simply calls qmail-inject.
Change your original scripts to call datemail directly.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:43:50AM -0800, Matt Simonsen wrote:
> >Strange... Try running this by hand:
> >
> >"/var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail"
> >
> >What do you get? The same error? The above line is what datemail does.
>
>
> Here it is:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -t
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: testing
> test from wrapguy...
>
>
> And it worked perfectly while qmail-inject was the standard file. It gave
> the below error as soon as I replaced qmail-inject with datemail.
>
> So, to reiterate, here's the problem. When I run the datemail script it
> works perfectly, too. But when I add a symbolic link or replace the file
> qmail-inject with datemail I get an error. Here's a series of commands that
> should clearly show what I mean:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# cp datemail qmail-inject
> cp: overwrite `qmail-inject'? y
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- a
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72 Mar 26 11:35 qmail-inject
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34748 Mar 26 11:22 qmail-inject.orig
> [root@wrapguy bin]# cat qmail-inject
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- a
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help, all-
>
> Matt
>
--
---------------------------------
Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior System Administrator
The National Business Network Inc.
localconnect(sm)
http://www.localconnect.net/
The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/
One Monroeville Center, Suite 850
Monroeville, PA 15146
(412) 810-8888 Phone
(412) 810-8886 Fax
Are you sure? Is this wrong?
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167/fid/208
As an aside, on my system /var/qmail/bin/sendmail is not a shell script as
your first sentence seems to imply but a seperate program... I don't know if
this has anything to do with my problems.
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail?
You cannot replace qmail-inject with a symlink to datemail. datemail uses
/var/qmail/bin/sendmail which simply calls qmail-inject.
Change your original scripts to call datemail directly.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:43:50AM -0800, Matt Simonsen wrote:
> >Strange... Try running this by hand:
> >
> >"/var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail"
> >
> >What do you get? The same error? The above line is what datemail does.
>
>
> Here it is:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -t
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: testing
> test from wrapguy...
>
>
> And it worked perfectly while qmail-inject was the standard file. It gave
> the below error as soon as I replaced qmail-inject with datemail.
>
> So, to reiterate, here's the problem. When I run the datemail script it
> works perfectly, too. But when I add a symbolic link or replace the file
> qmail-inject with datemail I get an error. Here's a series of commands
that
> should clearly show what I mean:
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# cp datemail qmail-inject
> cp: overwrite `qmail-inject'? y
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- a
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
>
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ls -l | grep qmail-inject
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72 Mar 26 11:35 qmail-inject
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34748 Mar 26 11:22 qmail-inject.orig
> [root@wrapguy bin]# cat qmail-inject
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail ${1+"$@"}
> [root@wrapguy bin]# ./qmail-inject
> sendmail: illegal option -- a
> sendmail: usage: sendmail [ -t ] [ -fsender ] [ -Fname ] [ -bp ] [ -bs ] [
> arg ... ]
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help, all-
>
> Matt
>
--
---------------------------------
Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior System Administrator
The National Business Network Inc.
localconnect(sm)
http://www.localconnect.net/
The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/
One Monroeville Center, Suite 850
Monroeville, PA 15146
(412) 810-8888 Phone
(412) 810-8886 Fax
"Matt Simonsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you sure? Is this wrong?
> http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167/fid/208
Looks wrong to me. datemail is a trivial shell script which invokes
sendmail. sendmail and qmail-inject take different options. It does
not make sense to simply replace qmail-inject with datemail. It makes
more sense to replace sendmail with datemail.
If your MUA wants to call sendmail, then you can do something like
this:
cd /var/qmail/bin
mv sendmail sendmail.basic
echo 'exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.basic ${1+"$@"}' >
sendmail
chmod +x sendmail
If your MUA wants to call qmail-inject, then you can do something like
this:
cd /var/qmail/bin
mv qmail-inject qmail-inject.basic
echo 'exec /var/qmail/bin/predate /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject.basic ${1+"$@"}' >
qmail-inject
chmod +x qmail-inject
But it is very unlikely that your MUA expects to call qmail-inject,
but does not generate a Date: header.
I don't personally recommend doing either of the above. I recommend
fixing your MUA to create a Date: header, or telling your MUA to use
`datemail' as a mailer rather than `sendmail'.
Ian
Since qmail's replacement for sendmail contains the following code:
arg = qiargv;
*arg++ = "bin/qmail-inject";
*arg++ = (flagh ? "-H" : "-a");
if (sender) {
*arg++ = "-f";
*arg++ = sender;
}
*arg++ = "--";
for (i = 0;i < argc;++i) *arg++ = argv[i];
*arg = 0;
execv(*qiargv,qiargv);
substdio_putsflush(subfderr,"sendmail: fatal: unable to run qmail-inject\n");
I would say that the statement about simply using a symlink was misleading at
best. qmail-inject is also an executable program which datemail is not. Just
because something is a wrapper for another program does not automatically make
it a script.
Restore your original qmail-inject executable and modify your scripts to call
datemail directly and I'll bet you it works as you would like it to. :)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:10:43PM -0800, Matt Simonsen wrote:
> Are you sure? Is this wrong?
> http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167/fid/208
>
> As an aside, on my system /var/qmail/bin/sendmail is not a shell script as
> your first sentence seems to imply but a seperate program... I don't know if
> this has anything to do with my problems.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail?
>
>
> You cannot replace qmail-inject with a symlink to datemail. datemail uses
> /var/qmail/bin/sendmail which simply calls qmail-inject.
>
> Change your original scripts to call datemail directly.
>
--
---------------------------------
Timothy L. Mayo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior System Administrator
The National Business Network Inc.
localconnect(sm)
http://www.localconnect.net/
The National Business Network Inc. http://www.nb.net/
One Monroeville Center, Suite 850
Monroeville, PA 15146
(412) 810-8888 Phone
(412) 810-8886 Fax
how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 (non standart port Ex:300)
under tcpserver?
THX.
Linux!audimed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 (non standart port Ex:300)
> under tcpserver?
If you mean qmail-smtpd, read the documentation for tcpserver. It will tell
you clearly.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Linux!audimed wrote:
> how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 (non standart port Ex:300)
> under tcpserver?
> THX.
you probably mean qmail-smtpd.
same way you'd do it with port 25 -- just use a different number.
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
-tcl.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:42:19PM -0300, Linux!audimed wrote:
> how can i run qmail on a port that is not 25 (non standart port Ex:300)
> under tcpserver?
> THX.
man tcpserver
(in other words: RTFM)
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Hi all,
I have qmail with checkpassword for qmail-pop3d, I try to use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED], where mydomain.com isnt the real
name of the host (dns is ok), the name of the host is host.myisp.com. I put
mydomain.com into locals and rcpthost, and all ok. The alias is configured by
a &user into the file qmail-alias in /var/qmail/alias. In the ~user directory
there is a file named .qmail with the ./Maildir/ directive. When I send email
from a valid user of the box to the alias, the email is received ok. When I
send an email from another address (out of the box), the email isnt received,
can anyone help me, please? It's very important and urgent. thanks.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:46:04PM +0200, The Beast wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have qmail with checkpassword for qmail-pop3d, I try to use
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED], where mydomain.com isnt the real
> name of the host (dns is ok), the name of the host is host.myisp.com.
DNS is not OK -- :
gwhite@bilbo:~$ dnsqr a host.myisp.com
1 host.myisp.com:
32 bytes, 1+0+0+0 records, response, authoritative, nxdomain
query: 1 host.myisp.com
> I put
> mydomain.com into locals and rcpthost, and all ok. The alias is configured by
> a &user into the file qmail-alias in /var/qmail/alias. In the ~user directory
> there is a file named .qmail with the ./Maildir/ directive. When I send email
> from a valid user of the box to the alias, the email is received ok. When I
> send an email from another address (out of the box), the email isnt received,
> can anyone help me, please? It's very important and urgent. thanks.
I doubt that anyone can send you any mail whatsoever when your hostname
is NXDOMAIN. Fix your DNS, and we'll work from there.
;)
--
Greg White
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable.
-- John F. Kennedy
|
Hi all,
I install qmail and chechpassword for use qmail-pop3d. All is
ok, but the aliases system don't run. I want tu deliver mail tu alias@domain.com. I place a .qmail-alias file in
/var/qmail/alias, with the text &user . The domain is an alias too, because
the name of the box is host.myisp.com. I try to send mail to alias from a local
user, and all is ok, but when I send mail from another box user, dont deliver
the mail. I have a problem with some users that the system dont deliver mail,
returning 550 error..User unknown. domain.com is placed in
/var/qmail/control/locals and /var/qmail/rcpthosts. All the users has a file
named .qmail with the text ./Maildir/ , there is a Maildir in all the home
users created with the maildirmake utility. Can anyone help me, please? I read
all the docs I see, and I can't resolve the problem,
thanks.
|
##from life whit qmail################
Create the /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
-u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
2>&1
##############
## -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
2>&1
############# ####
in the place of smtp. i must put 300 or the port i want. i believe.
Hello.
I just setup qmail supervised, and it seems to be running great. I also
managed to install pop3d supervised. But I noticed when I connect to check
my mail via pop3, it takes a LONG time to log in. I say it takes (or it
seems) nearly a minute to log in and check my mail.
It seems odd since if I check it once, when i check it again shortly after
it logs in much faster. But now that I checked it again today, whenever I
log in it would take nearly a minute each time in order to check my mail.
Here are my system specs...
FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE. Also used as a NATd box. I was wondering if anyone
has this similar setup with qmail. The reason I asked I was able to setup
another FreeBSD box with just a single NIC and running qmail supervised. I
log in via pop3 blazing fast (since it's on the LAN).
My only guess it must be NATd related (or how I set up the firewall on that
NATd box). Anyone runs this similiar setup encountering the same
long-logging-via-POP problems? Much appreciated. Thanks :)
--
Neafevoc
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:41:28PM -0800, Neafevoc K. Marindale wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I just setup qmail supervised, and it seems to be running great. I also
> managed to install pop3d supervised. But I noticed when I connect to check
> my mail via pop3, it takes a LONG time to log in. I say it takes (or it
> seems) nearly a minute to log in and check my mail.
do you start pop3d via tcpserver ? try the options -R -H and -l : it helped
a lot on my servers...
HTH,
Olivier
--
_________________________________________________________________
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
PGP signature
Neafevoc K. Marindale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just setup qmail supervised, and it seems to be running great. I also
> managed to install pop3d supervised. But I noticed when I connect to check
> my mail via pop3, it takes a LONG time to log in. I say it takes (or it
> seems) nearly a minute to log in and check my mail.
This is about the number-one Frequently Asked Question about qmail. It's
in all the documentation and FAQs. Check djb's FAQs, check www.qmail.org,
check the archives for this mailing list.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:41:28PM -0800, Neafevoc K. Marindale wrote:
> But I noticed when I connect to check
> my mail via pop3, it takes a LONG time to log in. I say it takes (or it
> seems) nearly a minute to log in and check my mail.
This is a FAQ. Read the tcpserver documentation. You are looking for the
identd- and dns-related options.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
hi,
but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the mailertable?
if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then forward
it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
cu ycae
Kirill Miazine wrote:
>
> * Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:01]:
> > hi,
> >
> > is it possible to forward all the emails for one domain to one email
> > address??
> >
> > like : @domain.com -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Yes,
>
> echo domain.com:user-domain >> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
> echo domain.com >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> HUP qmail-send
> echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~user/.qmail-domain-default
>
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > cu ycae
> > --
> > Yves Caetano
> > Server Support Engineer
> > Tel: 295383 254
> > Fax: 295383 222
> > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
> --
> Kirill
--
Yves Caetano
Server Support Engineer
Tel: +352 295383 254
Fax: +352 295383 222
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
* Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:01]:
> hi,
>
> is it possible to forward all the emails for one domain to one email
> address??
>
> like : @domain.com -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes,
echo domain.com:user-domain >> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
echo domain.com >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
HUP qmail-send
echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~user/.qmail-domain-default
>
> thanks
>
> cu ycae
> --
> Yves Caetano
> Server Support Engineer
> Tel: 295383 254
> Fax: 295383 222
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
--
Kirill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hi,
> but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the mailertable?
>
> if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
> mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
> domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
>
> i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then forward
> it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
>
> cu ycae
>
> Yves Caetano
> Server Support Engineer
I don't understand your meaning here. If, by your statement, you mean
that you think your qmail server is using pop3 protocol to receive
messages from a particular domain, you are mistaken. Servers never act
as pop3 servers unless people are retrieving mail from their inbox via
the pop3 protocol. The rest of the time, one server will initiate a
SMTP connection with another. As far as simply setting the route up
like that in your smtproutes file, it cannot be done. smtproutes only
accepts hosts, never users. Use the alias method and your mail should
route smoothly.
--
Keith
Network Engineer
Triton Technologies, Inc.
* Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 12:23]:
> hi,
> Kirill Miazine wrote:
> >
> > * Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:41]:
> > > hi,
> > > but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the mailertable?
> > >
> > > if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
> > > mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
> > > domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
> >
> > mailertable is used to redirect mail for entire domain to another host, not
> > a user
>
> yes it is possible, because i did it for a client of us :-))
Of course, stupid me, I was talking about qmail's smtproutes....
>
> cu ycae
> >
> > >
> > > i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then forward
> > > it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
> >
> > There's no pop here, every incoming mail for your domain simply gets
> > forwarded.
> >
> > >
> > > cu ycae
> > >
> > >
> >
> > P.S. I'm on the list, don't Cc messages to me
> >
> > --
> > Kirill
>
> --
> Yves Caetano
> Server Support Engineer
> Tel: +352 295383 254
> Fax: +352 295383 222
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
--
Kirill
Hi Yves
>>>>> "Yves" == Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi, but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the
> mailertable?
Not without writing a patch. Qmail's method is more extensive and
flexible than sendmail's, anyhow.
> if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
> mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
> domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
No. The difference between simply forwarding an e-mail on to another
server and saving it locally is a little larger than it may appear.
> i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then
> forward it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
Well, believe it or not, Kirill's suggestion doesn't make the server
`act as a popserver'. A popserver stores the mail for later
retrieval. The .qmail* files decide what happens to e-mail, not
necessarily where it is stored. Think about it. In simple terms, qmail
receives an e-mail. The domain name it is addressed to (in RCPT TO) is
not in locals, so it checks virtualdomains. It finds the domain there,
and forwards it on to prefix-domain-user locally. qmail then sees that
there is a .qmail file in ~prefix called .qmail-domain-default. It
then carries out the `commands' in this file which reroute the mail
again. So, in essence, the mail is never `stored' anywhere but gets
forwarded along a line. I think you will find that the time taken to
get one message from the outside world to the final user would be in
the...hmmm...let me think...seconds degree I would think?
Brett.
> cu ycae
> Kirill Miazine wrote:
>> * Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:01]: > hi, > > is
>> it possible to forward all the emails for one domain to one email >
>> address?? > > like : @domain.com -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Yes,
>>
>> echo domain.com:user-domain >> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
>> echo domain.com >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts HUP qmail-send echo
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~user/.qmail-domain-default
>>
>> > > thanks > > cu ycae > -- > Yves Caetano > Server Support
>> Engineer > Tel: 295383 254 > Fax: 295383 222 > email:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu -- Kirill
> -- Yves Caetano Server Support Engineer Tel: +352 295383 254 Fax:
> +352 295383 222 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
--
"Hey, I know this! This is Unix!"
- Jurassic Park
* Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:41]:
> hi,
> but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the mailertable?
>
> if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
> mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
> domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
mailertable is used to redirect mail for entire domain to another host, not
a user
>
> i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then forward
> it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
There's no pop here, every incoming mail for your domain simply gets
forwarded.
>
> cu ycae
>
>
P.S. I'm on the list, don't Cc messages to me
--
Kirill
Hi Brett,
thanks for the explanation.
thanks all for the help :-))
cu ycae
Brett Randall wrote:
>
> Hi Yves
>
> >>>>> "Yves" == Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hi, but isn't it possible to do it like in sendmail in the
> > mailertable?
>
> Not without writing a patch. Qmail's method is more extensive and
> flexible than sendmail's, anyhow.
>
> > if you take the smtproutes of qmail it is nearly the same than the
> > mailertable of sendmail but you cannot add a line like this
> > domain.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .is this true?
>
> No. The difference between simply forwarding an e-mail on to another
> server and saving it locally is a little larger than it may appear.
>
> > i don't want that the server will act as a popserver and then
> > forward it. i want the smtp to forward directly.
>
> Well, believe it or not, Kirill's suggestion doesn't make the server
> `act as a popserver'. A popserver stores the mail for later
> retrieval. The .qmail* files decide what happens to e-mail, not
> necessarily where it is stored. Think about it. In simple terms, qmail
> receives an e-mail. The domain name it is addressed to (in RCPT TO) is
> not in locals, so it checks virtualdomains. It finds the domain there,
> and forwards it on to prefix-domain-user locally. qmail then sees that
> there is a .qmail file in ~prefix called .qmail-domain-default. It
> then carries out the `commands' in this file which reroute the mail
> again. So, in essence, the mail is never `stored' anywhere but gets
> forwarded along a line. I think you will find that the time taken to
> get one message from the outside world to the final user would be in
> the...hmmm...let me think...seconds degree I would think?
>
> Brett.
>
> > cu ycae
>
> > Kirill Miazine wrote:
> >> * Yves Caetano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010326 11:01]: > hi, > > is
> >> it possible to forward all the emails for one domain to one email >
> >> address?? > > like : @domain.com -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> Yes,
> >>
> >> echo domain.com:user-domain >> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
> >> echo domain.com >> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts HUP qmail-send echo
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~user/.qmail-domain-default
> >>
> >> > > thanks > > cu ycae > -- > Yves Caetano > Server Support
> >> Engineer > Tel: 295383 254 > Fax: 295383 222 > email:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu -- Kirill
>
> > -- Yves Caetano Server Support Engineer Tel: +352 295383 254 Fax:
> > +352 295383 222 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
>
> --
> "Hey, I know this! This is Unix!"
>
> - Jurassic Park
--
Yves Caetano
Server Support Engineer
Tel: +352 295383 254
Fax: +352 295383 222
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.incotech.lu
Hi,
It seems that delivered messages as staying in the queue. 7 days later queue
mail is giving up "I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the
queue too long."
I know that 99% of these messages have been delivered successfully so I am
not sure why they are not purging from the queue.
Any help would be appreciated.
B
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:49:15PM -0800, Bill Crowley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that delivered messages as staying in the queue. 7 days later queue
> mail is giving up "I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the
> queue too long."
>
> I know that 99% of these messages have been delivered successfully so I am
> not sure why they are not purging from the queue.
If it's a single email to multiple recipients, then qmail will not
delete the message until 100% of the messages have been delivered
successfully.
> Any help would be appreciated.
Show the list examples of what you means, especially useful is the
output from qmail-qread
Regards.
Bill Crowley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that delivered messages as staying in the queue. 7 days later queue
> mail is giving up "I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the
> queue too long."
>
> I know that 99% of these messages have been delivered successfully so I am
> not sure why they are not purging from the queue.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> B
Lemme think here. If I'm not mistaken, the user that modifies the queue
is qmailq who owns the qmail-queue program. Now, on my installation of
qmail (and so I assume everyone elses) the qmail-queue program's
permissions are: -rws--x--x . So, bascially, the qmail-queue program
executes as root to modify the queue, therefore, permissions on the
queue directory shouldn't matter. What group is your qmailq user in?
What is his home directory? What are the permissions on your
qmail-queue binary? and what does your run file for qmail look like?
My best guess (if you hadn't deduced here) at this point is that the
permissions aren't right somewhere for the qmail system to make the
necessary changes the the queue; but there are a plethora of other
possibilities. =)
--
Keith
Network Engineer
Triton Technologies, Inc.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:53:44PM -0500, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
[snip]
> Lemme think here. If I'm not mistaken, the user that modifies the queue
> is qmailq who owns the qmail-queue program. Now, on my installation of
> qmail (and so I assume everyone elses) the qmail-queue program's
> permissions are: -rws--x--x . So, bascially, the qmail-queue program
> executes as root to modify the queue, therefore, permissions on the
> queue directory shouldn't matter. What group is your qmailq user in?
qmail-queue doesn't run as root. It runs as user qmailq. What group
this user is in, or what his homedir is, doesn't matter. Permissions
on the binary are relevant indeed.
Greetz, Peter.
Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> qmail-queue doesn't run as root. It runs as user qmailq. What group
> this user is in, or what his homedir is, doesn't matter. Permissions
> on the binary are relevant indeed.
>
> Greetz, Peter.
Odd. Why do I have a set-root-bit on my qmail-queue binary with an
owner of qmailq, then? I understand that it runs as user qmailq; but it
runs with root's permissions, correct? I have not modified it from the
installation put in place by the tarball.
--
Keith
Network Engineer
Triton Technologies, Inc.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:17:13PM -0500, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
> Peter van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > qmail-queue doesn't run as root. It runs as user qmailq. What group
> > this user is in, or what his homedir is, doesn't matter. Permissions
> > on the binary are relevant indeed.
> >
> > Greetz, Peter.
>
> Odd. Why do I have a set-root-bit on my qmail-queue binary with an
> owner of qmailq, then? I understand that it runs as user qmailq; but it
> runs with root's permissions, correct? I have not modified it from the
> installation put in place by the tarball.
There is no such thing as a set-root-bit. There is a setuid bit, and a
setgid bit... their name deescribes their purpose.
Regards.
Hi,
I am a qmail newbie. I am confused about the use of
defaulthost and envnoathost files. It seems that I only need one
of them.
If I send mail to 'username'.
The qmail will fill in username@defaulthost
and it also fill in username@envnoathost at the same time.
Please help me to straight things out.
Thanks,
Hoang
I can mail locally with either smtp, inject or sendmail but if I try to send
an email to my address on the qmail server from anywhere remote, I get a
bounced email from my server with the message below:
The original message was received at Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:26:32 -0700 (MST)
from gw.wnrg.com [64.70.27.226]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Host unknown (Name server: debian.wnrg.com:
host not found)
----- Original message follows -----
Received: from JT2k (gw.wnrg.com [64.70.27.226]) by mymobilecity.com (8.8.8)
id RAA22395 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:26:32 -0700
(MST)
From: "Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hi there brett
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:33:13 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
sdfds
sdfds
I think this is probably a simple one. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Brett.
Hi all...
How I can set quota message for qmail ?
Can you help me?
Thank you
cmail
I have noticed that some of the postings appear several times. The messages
are exactly the same, but the From: address is set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See for yourself: message 65233 and message 65295 (Subject: Subject: Re:
Sending attachments with qmail-inject)
What's going on?
--
Kirill
do you know how to set every email from qmail will make sms alert to my
handphone ?
is there any software which support this ?
thanks
Brett,
> Is this really a locals file? Try:
>
> mydomain.com
> server2.mydomain.com
>
> (ie without the :mydomain.com's)
>
> Brett.
Thanks for pointing that out. I am not sure how it got in, but that's how
it was. It's fixed now. Probably the 2am cut & paste while tunnelling in
from home. I took your advice and now the mail no longer stays on server1.
I haven't gotten them on server2 yet, but this is a firewall issue that I
need to resolve. I assume they are sitting in the queue waiting for the
firewall to open up.
jean
|
Dear sir,
I want to implement serial mail on my existing
qmail 1.03 , which is running at Red Hat 6.2.
Could you pl tell me how can i implement
this.
I am using mailbox format right now.
Regards
lokesh
|
|
Hello
Qmail FAQ states that tcpserver allows only 40
simultaneous qmail-smtpd connections and to increase it to 400, I need to
run
tcpserver -c 400
Would this number sustain after a
reboot...
How to do this for qmail-pop3d as well
Regards
Sumith
|
* Sumith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 04:16]:
Side note: would you *PLEASE* turn off HTML in your mail and fix your
line width - you're wasting other people's resources and make your
messages unnecessarily hard to read. http://learn.to/edit_messages
> Qmail FAQ states that tcpserver allows only 40 simultaneous
> qmail-smtpd connections and to increase it to 400, I need to run
> tcpserver -c 400
> Would this number sustain after a reboot...
That depends on how you start tcpserver.
> How to do this for qmail-pop3d as well
The same way? I mean, what do you expect us to do? Grab a crystal ball
and try to find out how you invoke your stuff? Why don't you *read* the
available documentation? Like:
Step 1: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22tcpserver+-c%22+qmail-send
Step 2: http://qmail.3va.net/qmailfaq.html#smtpd
Step 3: verify that this is correct: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
Keep in mind that a) this is not a support forum and b) helping you each
time you have a problem will 1) get on a *lot* of people's nerves and 2)
make you prone to not reading the documentation. Neither alternative is
desirable.
--
Robin S. Socha http://mail.socha.net/
Hello
I have 2 SMTP-servers running qmail placed on diffret physical location with
diffrent internet connections, so if my primary SMTP server is down or the
connection is broken the e-mails will end up on the secondary. I'm using
smtproute on the secondary to route all the incomming messages to my primary
server. This works perfect, if the primary server is down they are queued on
my secondary until the primary are back.
But my problem are, if someone is trying to use my secondary SMTP-server for
open relaying, the messages are routed to the primary server and that server
rejects them. The secondary generates a bounce message and are tryinging to
send it but because of the smtproutes it tries to send it to the primary
server and the bounce will be rejected and it will be a doubble bounce.
I want the bounce to be sended back to the sender without double bouncing.
Putting the rcpthosts file on the secondary server is not an option because
the file will be out of date almost immediately and the configuration I have
will not allow me to have a scheduled script that downloading that file.
So my question is if there are anyone who have an easy solution how I should
do so all messages are routed with smtproute except the bounce messages?
Andreas
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:33:18PM +0200, Andreas Grip wrote:
> But my problem are, if someone is trying to use my secondary SMTP-server for
> open relaying, the messages are routed to the primary server and that server
> rejects them.
So configure your secondary server properly. Stop it being an open
relay.
> Putting the rcpthosts file on the secondary server is not an option because
> the file will be out of date almost immediately and the configuration I have
> will not allow me to have a scheduled script that downloading that file.
Then your configuration is broken. Your problem is that you have a
publically available open-relay. It is that problem you need to fix.
Irritating bounce messages are just side effects of your open-relay.
james
--
James Raftery (JBR54)
"It's somewhere in the Red Hat district" -- A network engineer's
freudian slip when talking about Amsterdam's nightlife at RIPE 38.
