On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:19:17PM -0500, q question wrote: > I have shown respect for DJB and everyone on this list. I am looking very > seriously at installing djbdns, and I'm sure that djbdns is in fact probably > going to show itself to be superior to BIND. Heh, it's funny how some people talk about respect and yet hide behind fake e-mail addresses and pseudonyms. --Adam
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Dave Sill
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Henning Brauer
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Robin S. Socha
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? John Hogan
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? q question
- RE: Can MX record be CNAME? Adam McKenna
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Dave Sill
- Re: Can MX record be CNAME? Kris von Mach
- remove Dave Schultz