qmail Digest 23 May 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1373
Topics (messages 62839 through 62882):
R: R: leave a copy of messages on server
62839 by: Andrea Cerrito
62842 by: tonix (Antonio Nati)
Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server
62840 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: Timeout issues.
62841 by: Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: injecting qmail-queue (asking again)
62843 by: peter green
Qmail with amavis
62844 by: Francisco André Barbosa Neto
62848 by: Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
how control smtp relay
62845 by: Gustav-Martin Olsen
62866 by: daiyuwen
Re: leave a copy of messages on server
62846 by: Roberto Marzialetti
Re: qmail-pop3d and /var/spool/mail or NO /HOME/$USER
62847 by: Charles Cazabon
10 Million Messages per day
62849 by: Mark Lo
62850 by: Alex Povolotsky
62851 by: Charles Cazabon
62852 by: Mark Lo
62854 by: Philipp Steinkrüger
62865 by: Medi Montaseri
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default vs virtualdomains
62853 by: Dean Staff
62857 by: Charles Cazabon
manymanymany splogger processes
62855 by: Ahead of the Street
62856 by: Peter van Dijk
62860 by: Joshua Nichols
62862 by: Peter van Dijk
62863 by: Willy De la Court
Re: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0
62858 by: Hank Wethington
Re: pulling mail from other than new/cur (sorry again...better reply address)
62859 by: Paul Gregg
qmail-pop3d advice ( migrate to vpopmail ? )
62861 by: Renato
62864 by: Charles Cazabon
gcc programming with qmail
62867 by: KY Lui
Problems with SMTP connections
62868 by: Graham H.
62869 by: Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
webmail recommendations?
62870 by: Eric Paynter
62871 by: Chris Hellberg
62872 by: John Chapman
62873 by: Remo Mattei
62874 by: Olivier M.
62875 by: Robert Sander
R: webmail recommendations?
62876 by: Andrea Cerrito
62879 by: Olivier M.
62881 by: Henning Brauer
Re: bash script to use with vadddomain (vpopmail)
62877 by: jcarreiro
R: help: bash script to use with vadddomain (vpopmail)
62878 by: Andrea Cerrito
Message size limiting
62880 by: Davidson Thaba
R: R: webmail recommendations?
62882 by: Andrea Cerrito
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible.Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or you can set quota.It's not advisable to make the delete mandatory because:1) user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download them from another one,2) the data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a message unread by user)Good work---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372-----Messaggio originale-----I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete?
Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per conto di Medi Montaseri
Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 21.11
A: Andrea Cerrito
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server
That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server?Andrea Cerrito wrote:
Mmmmhhhh... strange.A normal pop3 session is like
...
stat
retr #num
dele #numand if you set "leave a copy..." the dele action is never done.
Try to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know
if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your client.I mean
+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
user $YOURUSER
+OK
pass $YOURPASS
+OK
stat
+OK 1 1228
retr 1
bla bla bla bla bla
quit
+OKthen reconnect and see if the message is still alive.
Good luck
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Roberto Marzialetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39
> A: Qmail List
> Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on server
>
>
> Hi boys
>
> have got a problem...
> well... if i active the option "leave a copy
> of messages on server " on my email client, the messages
> doesn't leave on my server :o((
>
> have you got some solution ?
>
> many thanks
>
> Roberto
>
>-- ======================================================================= Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. =======================================================================
I think you may do it, but you must modify your pop3 server. It should memorize the downloaded messages numbers and then execute the opportune "dele #" at the end of session (or immediately after RETR command, when a new command is given and it may be sure that previous RETR has completed). Or... If I'm not wrong, all read messages are moved to ../Maildir/cur, so you could delete all messages in those ../Maildir/cur directories. Tonino At 22/05/2001 22/05/2001 +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: >Mmmmhhh, I don't think it's possible. >Anyway, you can set a crontab to delete old messages (ie: 30 days old) or >you can set quota. > >It's not advisable to make the delete mandatory because: > >1) user may want to look his/her messages from a location, and to download >them from another one, >2) the data transfer may fail for some reason (and you force deletion of a >message unread by user) > >Good work > >--- >Cordiali saluti / Best regards >Andrea Cerrito >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. >P.zzale Bosco 3A >05100 Terni IT >Tel. +39 744 5441330 >Fax. +39 744 5441372 >-----Messaggio originale----- >Da: medi [mailto:medi]Per conto di Medi Montaseri >Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 21.11 >A: Andrea Cerrito >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Oggetto: Re: R: leave a copy of messages on server > >I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete? >That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server? > >Andrea Cerrito wrote: >>Mmmmhhhh... strange. >> >>A normal pop3 session is like >> >>... >>stat >>retr #num >>dele #num >> >>and if you set "leave a copy..." the dele action is never done. >>Try to telnet to your box and act as a mail client: you'll be able to know >>if it's a problem with qmail (I don't think so, anyway) or with your client. >> >>I mean >> >>+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>user $YOURUSER >>+OK >>pass $YOURPASS >>+OK >>stat >>+OK 1 1228 >>retr 1 >>bla bla bla bla bla >>quit >>+OK >> >>then reconnect and see if the message is still alive. >>Good luck >>--- >>Cordiali saluti / Best regards >>Andrea Cerrito >>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. >>P.zzale Bosco 3A >>05100 Terni IT >>Tel. +39 744 5441330 >>Fax. +39 744 5441372 >> >> > -----Messaggio originale----- >> > Da: Roberto Marzialetti >> [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Inviato: lunedì 21 maggio 2001 18.39 >> > A: Qmail List >> > Oggetto: leave a copy of messages on server >> > >> > >> > Hi boys >> > >> > have got a problem... >> > well... if i active the option "leave a copy >> > of messages on server " on my email client, the messages >> > doesn't leave on my server :o(( >> > >> > have you got some solution ? >> > >> > many thanks >> > >> > Roberto >> > >> > > >-- > >======================================================================= > >Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 > >Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. > >======================================================================= >
Medi Montaseri([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 12:11:25 +0000: > I have the opposit question, is it possible to mandate delete? > That is, can I mandate the all messages be downloaded from a POP server? it would probably break the protocol. /k -- > Black holes are where GOD is dividing by zero KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
most probably it is the dns setup. if you do not need to know the names of clients that are connecting, tcpserver -RHl0 is probably what you want. this won't work out with tcprules files that carry = for evaluating the $TCPREMOTEHOST variable. you might check the docs to tcpserver and tcprules: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html cheers, /k Hank Wethington([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.21 11:02:10 +0000: > I have about 6 qmail servers up and running in different parts of > California. For the most part life has been pretty easy with them. I have 3 > machines giving me a headache currently and was hoping for some help. (I > know 50% is a failing number) > > #1) A local machine running RH Linux and qmail 1.03. It had been running > great for the last 9 months. I recently had an IP change on the machine as I > switched DSL providers. I made sure all of the control files got changed and > the new tcp rules added. However, it appears to not want to pop mail with > out a long delay. My windows clients need to keep hitting wait. It > eventually works, but it is very frustrating, considering it worked fine > before the IP change. My guess is it relates to DNS. Am I on the right > track, or has anyone else seen this? Is there a way I can fix it without > long phone calls to my provider educating them on DNS and stuff :) > > #2) Is rather similar. Was built in house (RH Linux and qmail 1.03)and then > sent out. Worked fine here, however in the clients location they get > constant timeouts on SMTP and need to keep hitting wait as well. I am using > the -R in the tcpserver startup so that it won't try to resolve the local > IPs, but it is still happening. > > #3) Similar still. A large mail server I just built using Matt's BSD-qmail > toaster setup. In house worked fantastic. Bring it in the field for a small > ISP, and even trying to do a localhost port 25 connection is taking > sometimes 10 minutes!?! > > All of these problems seem related and it is probably something really > simple that is driving me crazy. If anyone has input on what I'm doing wrong > I'd really appreciate it. > > Hank Wethington > Information Logistics > > ================================================ > Information Logistics > www.GoInfoLogistics.com > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================ -- > I can emulate the Beta-version of every C #include <signal.h> > program I've ever written in two lines! -> main() {raise(11);} KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46
* Todd Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010522 01:09]: > I thought about that, but it isn't really an ezmlm question > anymore. There doesn't seem to be an example on using qmail-queue > anywhere. It seems to me that there probably should be. Fair enough. > >So make ezmlm-reject omit that behavior. `man ezmlm-reject` > > And give up the spam protection that this provides? No thanks :). There are ways of emulating this sort of spam protection with ezmlm-issubn; a couple have been mentioned on the ezmlm list. Check the archives at [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ezmlm]. > >Eek, why not invoke ezmlm-send for each list? `man ezmlm-send` No need > >to > >mess with qmail-queue, I don't think. > > Yea, that sounds nice, but there isn't an example of using that outside > of a .qmail file, either. I'd think that > > tfinney]$ cat ./list_monthly_announcement.txt | > /usr/local/bin/ezmlm/ezmlm-send /home/list/test/ > > would work, but no dice. That is indeed the syntax. I'm still pretty convinced that this is the best way to do this; you might want to look into why that doesn't work, regardless of any other solution. > > > >I created my message file, message.txt, and my envelope file > > > >envelope.txt. AFAIK, they're in the correct format. [...] > I tried three different formats. I believe the first is correct, but I > saw a few mentioning of the other two, and tried them. I saw no > difference in running the script with any of them. > > F [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0 > T [EMAIL PROTECTED]\0 > \0\0 This should be: [EMAIL PROTECTED]\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\0\0 Is that what you meant? > > > >open \*STDIN, "<&MSG"; > > > >open \*STDOUT, "<&ENV"; > > > >Er, off the top of my head, you want to reverse that wokka, since > >STDOUT is > >an output stream. Like: > > > > open \*STDIN, "<&MSG"; > > open \*STDOUT, ">&ENV"; Any luck with this? > >Anyway, it seems to be a lot of overkill. Just iterate over your lists > >and > >invoke ezmlm-send for each one. Done. > > Thanks, I'll look into that, but I think a little more explicit > documentation on qmail-queue would be helpful. John Levine just threw together a Perl module that invokes qmail-queue directly. See [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=qmail&m=99016757917465&w=2]; it might be helpful. (I'm actually already using it...it is *really* nice. :-) /pg -- Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Q. Why is this so clumsy? A. The trick is to use Perl's strengths rather than its weaknesses. --- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Connect On Internet Provider
http://www.connecton.com.br
Fone: 55-11-4655-2232
Francisco André Barbosa Neto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
> Hi All, I'd like to know if someone in the list are > using qmail with amavis-perl 11 in a Slackware 7.1 box? > Thank's! > > Francisco André Barbosa Neto I am. Best Regards, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653 Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303 http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello, i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in /etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying). Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks for the help best regards Gustav -- Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net
>i've many User the works with dhcp, so i can't set the ip or ip range in >/etc/tcp.smtp file. How can i control this user, i want that only this users >work with the smtp server. In the moment can anybody send (relaying). > >Can i filter, that the recipient or the sender must have definite domain >address? (for example to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or from: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] 'To' and 'From' fields can be forged. Try using relay-control. On the www.qmail.org, search keyword 'relay-control'. best regards, Dai yuwen ______________________________________ =================================================================== ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn) Ñ°ÕÒÐÂÏÊ, Ó®¿ÆÁú±ùÏä! (http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2847753;5579344;y?http://gd.sina.com.cn/ad/kelon) ʹÓÃÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐÅ¡°ÓʼþÌáÐÑ¡±¹¦ÄÜ£¬ËæʱÁ˽âµÄÊÕÐÂÐÅÇé¿ö£¡ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/docs/sina_mailalert.html)
Hi guys, isaac... -- isaac -- > When a message is read but not cleared, qmail moves the message from the > Maildir/new directory to Maildir/cur directory and appends ":2," to the end > of the message. yeah... i had seen :o) > From what information I could find regarding this problem, it all boils down > to the client email application and its POP functionality, not qmail. i solved my problem starting qmail-pop3d by tcpserver. -- peter --- >It does exactly what you tell it to. What is the problem? >Please state what you expected the computer to do, and >what it did instead. oky, excuse me :oP may many many thanks Roberto
Charles Olds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My goal is: > Install qmail to work with virtual users. (i.e. No account in > /etc/passwd. No /home/user. Mail delivered to /var/spool/mail.) You're limiting your options here by insisting on mbox format and /var/spool/mail. Much of the better software intended to be used with qmail uses Maildir format, and storage outside of /var/spool/mail . > I have downloaded and installed qmail, tcpserver, qmailadmin, etc.. > Everything looks good and runs except qmail-pop3d does not work with > virtual users. When trying to retrieve mail I get the message "No > /HOME/$USER directory... > > Please recommend a POP3 server that will work with qmail and allow mail > to be retrieved from /var/spool/mail. I'd personally recommend vmailmgr for virtual domain setups. However, it does necessitate Maildir storage (well, mostly) and at least one system account per virtual domain. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... Thank you Mark
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote: > If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I > need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000? Alex.
Mark Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I need > for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... You need to specify your requirements much more precisely for us to help you. For instance: 1) 10M messages -- what size messages? 2) Is this ten million copies of a single identical message (i.e., the same message text to each of ten million recipients)? Or is this ten million personalized messages, each to a single recipient? 3) What sort of latency is acceptable to you? Do you require that all recipients (well, those whose mailservers don't defer the delivery) recieve it within 2 hours? Or 20 minutes? Or is 24 hours acceptable? 4) Are the recipients local? Virtual? Remote-to-close-networks? Remote-to-the-net-at-large? The 10M number implies an answer to this question, but we don't want to assume incorrectly. The list archive is full of discussions on large/huge mailing lists and hardware required to host them. Try searching the archive. You can find pointers to it at qmail.org. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh.. 10 Million outbound messages... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Povolotsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Lo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:34 PM Subject: Re: 10 Million Messages per day > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote: > > If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I > > need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... > 10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do > you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP? > > > Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000? > > Alex. > >
Mark Lo writes: > Hi, > > If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I > need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth... > Have a look at the inter7 homepage (www.inter7.com). They offer preconfiguerd qmail server for low, medium and high usage. That will give you an idea, i guess. Regards, Philipp ------------ Philipp Steinkrüger Technik Oberberg Online Tel.: +49 2261 814240 Fax: +49 2261 814919 www.oberberg.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my opinion, design your system as wide as possible and not as tall as possible.
ie use a bunch of computers instead of one single tall one.Alex Povolotsky wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:15:48PM +0800, Mark Lo wrote:
> If I have 10 Million messages per day. What system requirement do I
> need for a qmail server. Etc. Memory.. CPU.. Bandwidth...
10 000 000 of inbound, outbound or transit EMails? What is typical size? do
you need also POP3/IMAP? What is expected load on POP3/IMAP?Are you sure you're going to get 10 000 000, not 100 000?
Alex.
-- ======================================================================= Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. =======================================================================
Hi,I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail- default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a specific mailbox. ie: /home/bubba/Maildir/ The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and we recieve messages addressed to "a-fax-number"@domain.com Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that domain to the Delivered To: field. Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax number unmodified. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Dean ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dean Staff Protus IP Solutions 210 - 2379 Holly Lane Ottawa, ON K1V 7P2 Canada 613-733-0000 ex 546 Fax 613-248-4553 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.protus.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dean Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to know if it's possible to edit the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail- > default file, so instead of it having a username or email address to > deliver messages for undefined users to, you have a defined path to a > specific mailbox. ie: /home/bubba/Maildir/ > > The reason I ask is because we provide and internet fax service, and > we recieve messages addressed to "a-fax-number"@domain.com > Obviously I can setup a user account for every possible fax number, > so we deliver anything undefined to 1 mailbox. THe problem is that in > the default setup qmail changes the Delivered To: address to the user > listed in the /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default file. And if I use the > virtualdomain feature it prepends the username defined for that > domain to the Delivered To: field. > > Niether option is particularly useful, as we need to see the fax > number unmodified. Perhaps you could try this: -make the domain virtual. For instance, "dom.net:virtuser1" in virtualdomains. -have .qmail files in ~virtuser1 to handle the "real" users, if any: ~virtuser1/.qmail-joe contains "/home/virtuser1/Mail/joe/" or similar. This could be a vmailmgr domain perhaps? -have ~virtuser1/.qmail-default to handle all the fax numbers. You can then refer to $DEFAULT in a script to get the original mail address (fax number). `man qmail-command` and `man dot-qmail` for details. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger? I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? --joshua.
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Ahead of the Street wrote: > Anyone have a guess why qmail is running thousands of copies of splogger? We don't guess. We give answers, if you ask questions. > I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and > working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it > /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please provide more detail: - how are you starting qmail - how are you sending out the mailing - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog and any other details that are relevant. Greetz, Peter.
Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place. It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process problem? > > I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and > > working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it > > /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? > > No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please > provide more detail: > - how are you starting qmail With supervise. I've added several key files below for a more complete reference. > - how are you sending out the mailing It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for sendmail. > - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages: May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used FILES: /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run --------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh exec /var/qmail/rc --------------------------------------- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run --------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send --------------------------------------- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run --------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net /bin/ \ checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ pop3d& --------------------------------------- /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run --------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d --------------------------------------- /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail --------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh -e # /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem. # borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail # modified by Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin case "$1" in start) echo -n "Starting mail-transport-agent:" svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/* echo -n " qmail" svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log echo " logging." ;; stop) echo -n "Stopping mail-transport-agent: " echo -n " qmail" svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/* echo " logging" svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log ;; restart) $0 stop $0 start ;; reload|force-reload) echo "Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files." svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send ;; *) echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}' exit 1 esac exit 0 --------------------------------------- /etc/rc.local (partial) --------------------------------------- /etc/init.d/svscan start tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & ---------------------------------------
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote: [snip] > FILES: > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /var/qmail/rc > --------------------------------------- Looks good, as long as there is no & in /var/qmail/rc > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 > /var/log/qmail/qmail-send > --------------------------------------- Looks good. > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net > /bin/ \ > checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | > /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ > pop3d& > --------------------------------------- You should remove everything behind the | (and the | itself) here. Logging is handled by multilog as you show below, and the & at the end makes it all respawn way often. > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 > /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d > --------------------------------------- Looks good. [snip] > > /etc/rc.local (partial) > --------------------------------------- > /etc/init.d/svscan start > tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ > /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & > --------------------------------------- You can remove the tcpserver line, this is handled by the qmail-pop3d supervise. Greetz, Peter.
Sorry about this but this is a junkyard. read on On Tuesday, May 22, 2001 19:44, Joshua Nichols [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Sorry about the long posting, but at least everythings in one place. > > It seems to me that qmail-pop3d is not running correctly, thus explaining > the errors in /var/log/maillog, but is that also causing my splogger process > problem? > > > > > I just sent out a sizable mailing, so I expect the server to be busy and > > > working hard, but seriously... thousands of copies of splogger? Is it > > > /supposed/ to run a new instance for each outgoing message? > > > > No, not at all. You are obviously doing something wrong. Please > > provide more detail: > > - how are you starting qmail > > With supervise. I've added several key files below for a more complete > reference. > > > - how are you sending out the mailing > It's a perl script that uses sendmail, but it is the qmail replacement for > sendmail. > > > - are the splogger processes visibly doing something towards syslog > > Well, /var/log/maillog has tons of these error messages: > > May 22 11:31:57 nsc pop3d: 990545517.798654 tcpserver: fatal: unable to > bind: address already used > > > > FILES: > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /var/qmail/rc > --------------------------------------- where is the contents of /var/qmail/rc ?????? > > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 > /var/log/qmail/qmail-send > --------------------------------------- > > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net > /bin/ \ > checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | > /var/qmail/bin/splogger \ > pop3d& > --------------------------------------- remove the | /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d& from the above script the logging is done in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run this is why you get a lot of splogger processes > > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000 > /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d > --------------------------------------- > > > /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail > --------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh -e > # /etc/init.d/qmail : start or stop the qmail mail subsystem. > # borrowed from http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#start-qmail > # modified by Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin > > case "$1" in > start) > echo -n "Starting mail-transport-agent:" > svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/* > echo -n " qmail" > svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log > echo " logging." > ;; > stop) > echo -n "Stopping mail-transport-agent: " > echo -n " qmail" > svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/* > echo " logging" > svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/*/log > ;; > restart) > $0 stop > $0 start > ;; > reload|force-reload) > echo "Reloading 'locals' and 'virtualdomains' control files." > svc -h /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send > ;; > *) > echo 'Usage: /etc/init.d/qmail {start|stop|restart|reload}' > exit 1 > esac > > exit 0 > --------------------------------------- > > > /etc/rc.local (partial) > --------------------------------------- > /etc/init.d/svscan start > tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ > /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & > --------------------------------------- remove tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup mail.nextstepcapital.net \ /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & because qmail-popup is already running under supervise this is why you get the error message fatal: unable to bind: address already used >
You can try Matt's FreeBSD-Qmail toaster. Although he doesn't use maildrop in there. I added it with the qmailqueue to check for VBS scripts before delivering e-mail without much of a problem. Check it out http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail.toaster.shtml Hank Wethington Information Logistics ================================================ Information Logistics www.GoInfoLogistics.com mailto:info.at.GoInfoLogistics.com ================================================ -----Original Message----- From: Roy Svendsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qmail + vpopmail + maildrop + sqwebmail 2.0.0 Hi! Anyone that have put opp something like this? How do I set up Maildrop too work under vpopmail so I can build filter with sqwebmail 2.0.0 Have'nt found any good information on this one! Best regard -- Roy Svendsen Life is like an potato!
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Sure you can - rather stupid buying the cake in the first place if you >>can't eat it ;-) > > No you can't. If you eat it, you no longer have it. Of course, you > could eat half of it and still have half of it. :-) Yes you do still have it. Might not be quite as accessable after eating it and I'm not sure you'd want to get it back. But you still have it for the next 24-48 hours and possibly longer if you like Mr. Hankey. :-) Paul. -- | Paul Gregg |T: +44 (0) 28 90424190 | Technical Director |F: +44 (0) 28 90424709 | The Internet Business Ltd |W: http://www.tibus.com | Holywood House, Innis Court |E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Holywood, Co Down, BT18 9HF |P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all, I have a server which has about 50.000 e-mail accounts. POP3 concurrency is set to 150 and timeout to 90 seconds. A couple of days ago, my users started to feel a huge delay in getting their messages via POP and sometimes, they even cannot connect. I checked the number of simultaneous number of connections and is not close to 150. Of course, concurrency increased a little bit ( around 100 ) in the past few days, but it didn't reach the limit yet. I think my machine is on its knees right now :((, but I cannot afford to have a better hardware at this moment. What can I do to improve performance ? ( I mean software performance... ). The migrating to vpopmail would help ? What about mysql to authenticate users ? Thanks Renato - Brazil P.S. I'm using qmail+vmailmgr, so I have thousands of passwd.cdb files...
Renato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, Don't post a new question by replying to an existing thread. This messes up the threading in our MUAs and in the list archives. As for your problem: it's the absolute #1 most frequently asked question. It's in the FAQs, it's in the list archives hundreds of times, and its even in one mailing list member's .sig. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: gcc programming with qmailHello
i want to develop an application which can send mail through the qmail system.
could you please give me a starting point of this?
i don't know how to do itthanks
KY
Hey, I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my question is a but mundane. I have read all the INSTALL docs and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything. Here's the deal: Everything gets delivered locally just fine. Even remotely to certain domains. However, when sending messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those servers. I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough, I can't get a connection. However, I know these domains are receiving. Should I be running a local DNS server? If so, I don't see why. Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a config file. Any help is appreciated. Flames are welcome to my email address so as not to clog up the mailing list. Thanks again, -- Graham
> Hey, > > I'm pretty new to qmail, so I apologize in advance if my > question is a but mundane. I have read all the INSTALL docs > and the FAQ, so I hope I haven't overlooked anything. > Here's the deal: > > Everything gets delivered locally just fine. Even remotely > to certain domains. However, when sending messages to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], my logs tell me > that qmail could not establish an SMTP connection with those > servers. I telnet to 25 on a given server, and sure enough, > I can't get a connection. However, I know these domains are > receiving. Should I be running a local DNS server? If so, > I don't see why. Perhaps I'm just a gimp and I overlooked a > config file. You can't get a connection ONLY from your server ? Or from you hole link ? If only particular from your server, try tracing the route to these hosts, from a working machine and from the server. Since you can receive/send to a couple of other domains with 100% success, it looks like you are on a network/routing trouble. > > Any help is appreciated. Flames are welcome to my email > address so as not to clog up the mailing list. > > Thanks again, > > -- Graham Best Regards, -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga - Analista de Suporte - #179653 Blumenau - Santa Catarina. Tel. (47) 9102-3303 http://www.netron.com.br/~eduardo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- /"\ \ / Campanha da Fita ASCII - Contra Mail HTML X ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail / \
I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: oMail-webmail NeoMail AtDot EmuMail Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with qmail? Any comments appreciated. Thanks, -Eric P. ------------------------------------------------------- arctic bears - the internet - your way. email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. http://www.arcticbears.com
Eric Paynter wrote: > I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email > solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking > qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. > We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: > > oMail-webmail > NeoMail > AtDot > EmuMail > > Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well > with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, > but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, > can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with > qmail? > > Any comments appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -Eric P. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > arctic bears - the internet - your way. > email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. > http://www.arcticbears.com I've found courier sqwebmail to be a good solution. Works nicely with maildir's and is free (not sure about commercial licensing though). Has all sorts of different method you can use for authentication. Chris
Eric, Check out Vpopmail at www.inter7.com. Works quite well. John Chapman From: "Eric Paynter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: webmail recommendations? Date sent: Tue, 22 May 2001 20:14:40 -0700 > I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete > email solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already > strongly thinking qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have > native webmail support. We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail > servers on the floor are: > > oMail-webmail > NeoMail > AtDot > EmuMail > > Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they > integrate well with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know > oMail supports it, but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain > if the others do. Also, can anybody suggest any other webmail servers > that integrate well with qmail? > > Any comments appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -Eric P. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > arctic bears - the internet - your way. > email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. > http://www.arcticbears.com > > > >
Eric Paynter wrote: > I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email > solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already strongly thinking > qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native webmail support. > We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: > > oMail-webmail > NeoMail > AtDot > EmuMail > > Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they integrate well > with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail supports it, > but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the others do. Also, > can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with > qmail? > > Any comments appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -Eric P. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > arctic bears - the internet - your way. > email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. > http://www.arcticbears.com Wrong!! Yes it does have webmail support, it's called sqwebmail good program and very fast, you can also use IMP. I will work with maildir no problem. Remo
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 08:14:40PM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote: > We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: > oMail-webmail ok (hopefully :) will work with vpopmail. > NeoMail not for maildirs... > AtDot > EmuMail pop3-based mailers afaik + sqwebmail + imp + dwebmail (look on freshmeat) Regards, Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
Hi! We are happy with Aeromail, an IMAP-based PHP webmail script (or scripts). It comes with Debian sid and has a homepage: http://the.cushman.net/projects/aeromail/ Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 +493024345330 10435 Berlin
I think the "good-for-all" solution can be SQWebMail: it work with any authentication scheme (and this can be a starting point when talking about scalability), can change users password, can read messages from Maildirs and relay only on few needs. Other websolutions, even so good, may be limitative: I mean, you have to choose between pop3 and imap support, php, missing features ... You can decide only after you have in mind what you really want from a webmail solution. --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: remo [mailto:remo]Per conto di Remo Mattei > Inviato: mercoledi 23 maggio 2001 5.34 > A: Eric Paynter > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: webmail recommendations? > > > Eric Paynter wrote: > > > I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email > > solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already > strongly thinking > > qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native > webmail support. > > We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are: > > > > oMail-webmail > > NeoMail > > AtDot > > EmuMail > > > > Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they > integrate well > > with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail > supports it, > > but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the > others do. Also, > > can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with > > qmail? > > > > Any comments appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Eric P. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > arctic bears - the internet - your way. > > email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year. > > http://www.arcticbears.com > > Wrong!! Yes it does have webmail support, it's called sqwebmail > good program > and very fast, you can also use IMP. I will work with maildir no problem. > > Remo > >
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:14:24AM +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: > I think the "good-for-all" solution can be SQWebMail: it work with any > authentication scheme (and this can be a starting point when talking about wrong, it only works with vpopmail-based accounts, and maybe vanilla-qmail accounts. Or please show me an example where it works with vmailmgr.... (would be nice if it could with vmailmgr...) Cheers, Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:14:24AM +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: > > I think the "good-for-all" solution can be SQWebMail: it work with any > > authentication scheme (and this can be a starting point when talking about > wrong, it only works with vpopmail-based accounts, and maybe vanilla-qmail > accounts. Wrong. It works with every authentification method it has an module for, and there are many. I'm using sqwebmail with qmail-ldap. > Or please show me an example where it works with vmailmgr.... Don't know about this. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
VDOMAINSOLDFILE="/home/tech/vdomain.txt.old"
NEWDOMAINSFILE="/home/tech/new_vdomains.list"
NEWVDOMAINS="/var/tmp/new_vdomains.tmp"if test -s $VDOMAINSFILE
then
if [ $VDOMAINSFILE -nt $VDOMAINSOLDFILE ]; then
diff -u $VDOMAINSOLDFILE $VDOMAINSFILE | grep -v "^+++" | grep -v "^+;" | grep "^+" | sed -e s/^+//g >> $NEWVDOMAINS
fi
#
awk 'BEGIN { FS=":"} {print $1 " " "test"}' $NEWVDOMAINS > $NEWDOMAINSFILE
vadddomain && cat $NEWDOMAINSFILE
rm $NEWVDOMAINS $NEWDOMAINSFILE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------and here the output file :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------# less new_vdomains.list
test.org testorg
test.net testnet---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------thx in advance
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: jcarreiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledì 23 maggio 2001 10.25
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: help: bash script to use with vadddomain (vpopmail)hi all,i'm trying to write an script who automatically creates new virtual domains in vpopmailmy script uses the vadddomain binarie from vpopmail.the syntax for vadddomain is : vadddomain [domain name] [postmaster passwd]so i create i text file with :......test.com test.......the problem is that vadddomain doesn't treat my file per line ....well, i'm a script newbie, so i let you see what i'm doing :)) script is next :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PATH="$PATH:/var/spool/popmail/bin"VDOMAINSFILE="/home/tech/vdomain.txt"
VDOMAINSOLDFILE="/home/tech/vdomain.txt.old"
NEWDOMAINSFILE="/home/tech/new_vdomains.list"
NEWVDOMAINS="/var/tmp/new_vdomains.tmp"if test -s $VDOMAINSFILE
then
if [ $VDOMAINSFILE -nt $VDOMAINSOLDFILE ]; then
diff -u $VDOMAINSOLDFILE $VDOMAINSFILE | grep -v "^+++" | grep -v "^+;" | grep "^+" | sed -e s/^+//g >> $NEWVDOMAINS
fi
#
awk 'BEGIN { FS=":"} {print $1 " " "test"}' $NEWVDOMAINS > $NEWDOMAINSFILE
vadddomain && cat $NEWDOMAINSFILE
rm $NEWVDOMAINS $NEWDOMAINSFILE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------and here the output file :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------# less new_vdomains.list
test.org testorg
test.net testnet---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------thx in advance
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 05/12/2000
Well, sorry, you are right. I forgot... :( --- Cordiali saluti / Best regards Andrea Cerrito ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A. P.zzale Bosco 3A 05100 Terni IT Tel. +39 744 5441330 Fax. +39 744 5441372 > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Olivier M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Inviato: mercoledi 23 maggio 2001 10.40 > A: Andrea Cerrito > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: R: webmail recommendations? > > > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:14:24AM +0200, Andrea Cerrito wrote: > > I think the "good-for-all" solution can be SQWebMail: it work with any > > authentication scheme (and this can be a starting point when > talking about > > wrong, it only works with vpopmail-based accounts, and maybe vanilla-qmail > accounts. Or please show me an example where it works with vmailmgr.... > (would be nice if it could with vmailmgr...) > > Cheers, > Olivier > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland > qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
