On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 08:12:03PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 01:00:46PM -0700, Jos Backus allegedly wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 05:58:49PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> > > It's a bummer that ktrace is like that on FreeBSD. It doesn't show the
> > > *current* system call that the process is sitting on. Conversely,
> > > truss on Solaris does this nicely...
> >
> > But FreeBSD does have a (procfs-based) truss.
>
> Right. But it suffers from the same problem that ktrace does in that
> it starts with the next system call, not the current one. Leastwise it
> does on a 4.3 I have access to, do you get something different?
I get what you get :)
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
