On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:42:28PM -0700, Adam Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 06:03:41AM -0600, Jeff Palmer wrote:
> > And if your NFS server goes down, both servers are useless. In which
> > case, what was the point of having a backup server again?
>
> Which is why you deploy this with something like a NetApp filer, that lets you
> deliver to NFS, and have multiple external pop3 servers as well. (And have two
> NetApp's mirroring your data at the same time)
Or just being clustered on the same set of shelves which use RAID4
themselves, so one of each kind of part can go down :)
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
