On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:15:11PM +0000, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: [snip] > I'm not sure on the statement that qmail is unreliable under Linux due to > its assumptiopn that "link is a synchronous operation". I've never read > anything about it. Anyone else? This is true. I'm not sure, however, if this is ext2fs's or Linux's fault. If the latter, ReiserFS suffers as well. Greetz, Peter -- Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
- ReiserFs and qmail Paco Gracia
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Nick (Keith) Fish
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Peter van Dijk
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Balazs Nagy
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Brian Moon
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Charles Cazabon
- Re: ReiserFs and qmail Dave Sill