Many Thanks Charles, I used -H, -l localname with tcpserver and it works
fine even with the LVS.
For the remote concurrency, what I meant to ask was " is it okay to set the
remote concurrency to 254 without the patch or will I run in to issues later
on when it really needs those concurrencies?"
Regards,
Mehul
Mehul Choksi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any ideas why qmail with the Linux Virtual Server takes so long
> for the connection even with the tcpserver -R and -t 0??
There are other data-gathering options to tcpserver. This is FAQ#1.
> Also, I have not yet applied the big-concurrency patch (I always run in to
> trouble with that patch..!!), and yet I have set the concurrencyremote to
> 254. So far it is doing good, but not sure if it is okay. Any suggestion?
Very, very few sites need concurrency > 255. Skip the patch until you
determine you really do need it.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
