On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:36:49AM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote: > Well first, if you're using gnu patch (which you should be) that > command is malformed. Probably a typo, since there was obviously some data for patch to work on. > If it weren't, I may guess "wrong -pnum". No, the output clearly shows that qmail-smtpd.c was correctly found, so -p problems don't factor into this. My guess is that Charrua applied another patch before this one that inserted a whole bunch of stuff at the top of qmail-smtpd.c, thus throwing this patch off. Either that, or he typo'd again and accidentally blanked qmail-smtpd.c (it's happened to me before 8-). Charrua, your best bet is to delete the whole source tree and unpack it again. If you applied more than one patch that affects qmail-smtpd.c, try changing the order in which you apply them. - Adrian
