> For 1): use a real OS.
No chance, it's not my choice and it is a constraint.
> For 2): divide your list in 10 parts of 1000 emails (for example) and
> handle these normally, but all at the same time.
As I said there is only one process that builds up the mails,
and I don't really like to build up batch files or to send all
injects in background.
I forgot to say that I only need to "send" mails, not to receive them. I
don't think this will make any difference though.
Thanks for help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Speed up injecting
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:29:58AM +0200, Gianni Campanile wrote:
> [snip]
> > 1) Solaris (Slowlaris);
> > 2) Only one process can injects the mails, so there is
> > no concurrency on the injection phase.
> >
> > I've tried to use qmail-queue directly, but I gained very little.
> >
> > It seems that the bottleneck is in the overhead of starting the
> > qmail-inject (or qmail-queue) for every mail, since qmail-send
> > is extermely fast in consuming the queue.
> >
> > What can I do ?
>
> For 1): use a real OS.
> For 2): divide your list in 10 parts of 1000 emails (for example) and
> handle these normally, but all at the same time.
>
> Greetz, Peter
> --
> Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
>
