On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > Charles M. Hannum writes: > > > > Uhhh, did you *read* my first piece of email? If I get a VERP address > > of `[EMAIL PROTECTED]', > > how pray tell is my mailing list software supposed to know that the > > mail was actually sent to `[EMAIL PROTECTED]'? A better question is: Why is the the envelope return path getting munged? Or: What does VERP have to do with Delivered-To? > It's supposed to strip off the "foo-owner-mycroft-" prefix and the > "@netbsd.org" suffix, and change the rightmost = into an @. Were you > expecting me to write the script for you? Why strip "mycroft-"? -Dave
- virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Charles M. Hannum
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Alex Pennace
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Charles M. Hannum
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Russell Nelson
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Alex Pennace
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Charles M. Hannum
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Russell Nelson
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-T... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-T... Dave Sill
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Charles M. Hannum
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To Russell Nelson
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-To John R. Levine
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-T... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Deliver... John R. Levine
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and De... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP an... John R. Levine
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VER... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: virtualdomains vs. VERP and Delivered-T... Filip Salomonsson