You need to
# yum remove libtool-ltdl
# yum install libtool-libs

Then install courier-authlib.

Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Eric,

Did the yum install libtool-ltdl and got....
*******************************************
cd courier-authlib-0.58
+ '[' -n /var/tmp/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-root -a /var/tmp/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-root '!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-root
+ '[' -d /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/courier-authlib-0.58 ']'
+ rm -rf /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/courier-authlib-0.58
+ exit 0
Executing(--clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.17286
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ rm -rf courier-authlib-0.58
+ exit 0
error: Failed dependencies:
        libtool-ltdl conflicts with courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1.i386


*/"Eric \"Shubes\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

    Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
     > Eric,
     >
     > The problem with the "# yum install libtool-ltdl" is that the
    dependancy script actually removes libtoo-ltd1.

    I don't understand this.

     > And even when I install it and compile I then get an error
    message saying something not to nice about libtoo-ltd1.

    You need to be more specific about error messages for anyone to be
    of any help.

     > I really don't know how to get that file in there in the right
    manner.

    If you did, you wouldn't be posting on the list, would you? ;)

     > Knowing what I know now I probably should have used centos ....
    but I
     > can't change that now, unfortunately, as I have other applications
     > running on that server.
     >
     > */"Eric \"Shubes\"" /* wrote:
     >
     > fuzzy wrote:
     > > On Mon, September 18, 2006 12:32 pm, Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
     > >> Help please!
     > >
     > > {snip}
     > >
     > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] qtms-install]# ls -al /usr/local/lib
     > >> total 704
     > >> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Sep 21 2005 .
     > >> drwxr-sr-x 16 root root 4096 Jul 20 2005 ..
     > >
     > > {snip}
     > >
     > >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24528 Jul 20 2005 libltdl.a
     > >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 795 Jul 20 2005 libltdl.la
     > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jul 20 2005 libltdl.so ->
     > >> libltdl.so.3.1.0
     > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jul 20 2005 libltdl.so.3 ->
     > >> libltdl.so.3.1.0
     > >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22772 Jul 20 2005 libltdl.so.3.1.0
     > >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 21 2005 pkgconfig
     > >
     > > from your ls output, the file is on your system, and ownership
     > and perms
     > > look ok.
     >
     > Looks ok to me too.
     >
     > > do this:
     > > #cat $PATH
     >
     > I think you mean
     > # echo $PATH
     >
     > > is /usr/local/lib in your $PATH? i assume it is not, otherwise
     > that file
     > > should be found, yes?
     >
     > No. $PATH is used for executables such as /bin and /sbin (and
     > /usr/bin and
     > /usr/local/bin etc). /lib is for dynamically loaded executables, and
     > shouldn't be in your $PATH. /lib (and /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib)
     > modules
     > need to be loaded (or linked) before being executed, so they're
     > inherently
     > different, although they do technically contain execuable code.
     >
     > > /usr/local/lib is in my $PATH on my centos box, and the file in
     > question
     > > is in /usr/lib here.
     >
     > I don't think you want any /lib directories in your $PATH. My 2
     > centos boxes
     > don't have them, and they work just fine.
     >
     > > maybe a symlink or a $PATH correction is in order. check that out.
     >
     > I don't think so. On my FC5 box, these files are in /usr/lib, not
     > /usr/local/lib. This leads me to believe that these modules were
     > installed
     > from source instead of from a binary rpm. This file is part of the
     > libtool-ltdl package.
     >
     > I would try
     > # yum install libtool-ltdl
     > to fix the problem. You might want to remove the locally built one
     > first.
     >
     > > i always advise the use of centos...it is what they develop
    this on.
     > > centos+qmailtoaster works with zero install issues, it has a
     > loooong life
     > > cycle(2012), it is easy to admin if you are already using rh
     > (fedora? no
     > > new skills needed), and it is stable. if all you need is a (q)mail
     > > server, look no further.
     >
     > I think that CentOS is the most appropriate distro for the
    toaster too.
     >
     > --
     > -Eric 'shubes'
     >


--
-Eric 'shubes'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to