I've had very similar issues. I was testing the load
performance of my qmailtoaster machine. I had my web server email 400 unique
emails to my account, I only received a measly 100 or so of them. During the
"mass mail", pop3 became unresponsive for me and other customers until all the
mails were dealt with.. it was nasty. They were white listed as well, with spam
ratings of -100, so I know spamd was not deleting them. The server seems to do
fine under normal circumstances, but I do fear one bad spam day the server will
be overwhelmed and emails will be lost.
I don't know of a solution. Cranking up the "max concurrent
incoming smtp" didn't seem to have a whole lot of effect.
Jared
From: Chris Godwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 8:02 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV Hello
all,
I’m new to qmail toaster, not new to qmail. I have a centos install of qmail
toaster. I would say that about 20% of all email destined for the server gets
dropped by qmail-smtpd, which exites with code 11 according to tcpserver. I
cannot determine why this is happening. As a work around, I’m running all mail
into a postfix machine, which then delivers it to the qmail-toaster machine. In
that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to believe that it
isn’t an issue with the content of the message killing qmail-smtpd, but rather
the source in which it is coming from. Has anyone seen this or know about
it?
|
- [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV Chris Godwin
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV Jared Markell
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV Chris Godwin
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEG... buffalo
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SI... Chris Godwin
- Re: [qmailtoaster] Status ... Peter Peltonen
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Sta... Chris Godwin
- [qmailtoaster] whiteli... Matt Decker
- Re: [qmailtoaster] Status ... Eric \"Shubes\"
- RE: [qmailtoaster] Sta... Chris Godwin
- Re: [qmailtoaster]... Eric \"Shubes\"
- RE: [qmailtoaster]... Chris Godwin