You are correct. It took me forever to determine that, as it is no longer optional on DKIM. DKIM is the new replacement for DomainKeys, based on the same technology.
Erik On 1/9/07, Alexey Loukianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings, Erik. 4 января 2007 г., 20:56:59 you have wrote: > I think the problem may be with the qmail-dk not setting an h= line > limiting what is signed. > Forwarded Gmail messages still show up as DomainKey-Status good, but > e-mails generated by the QmailToaster do not. > It looks like we don't have full compliance with the spec. Well, we ARE compliant to the specs. It is up to MTA to decide, whether to use part of headers or the whole headers to sign a message. In any case, that is on my TODO list to rewrite qmail-dk to use only part of headers to sign a message. I hadn't decided yet how to determine what header fields to use, will think about it a bit later, just before implementing it in a new version of qmail-dk. -- Best Regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Development Department, Lavtech Corp http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
