Hi Eric
there is no /usr/lib/libsrs2.so on any of the systems I tested, it is the building script that bugs on fedora systems
I tested on 2 fc3, 1 fc4 and 3 fc5 none have the libsrs2 installed
it did work on a fc5 where I had libsrs2 compiled previoulsy


Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Jason,
You appear to have the same problem as Trung, which is apparently limited to
64 bit machines. As he discovered, the files not found are being put in the
lib directory instead of the lib64 directory. I expect that's a bug in the
Makefile, which I'm sure EE will look into when he gets a the chance.

Philip,
You, on the other hand, appear to have a different problem. It doesn't like
the /usr/lib/libsrs2.so file that's on your system, as it apparently isn't
owned by any package. You can confirm this by
# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libsrs2.so
If it's indeed not part of a package, where'd it come from? What's the date
on it? Did you build it from source at some point? I think if you remove it
(or rename it to be on the safe side) your install will proceed further.

Jason P wrote:
I am also having trouble on a centos 4064 system (worked fine on cnt40
box)...

#rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt4064 libsrs2-toaster-*.src.rpm

...<snip>

RPM build errors:
    File not found by glob:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.*
    File not found: /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a
    File not found:
/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on all FC3-6 systems

So busy today, didnt have time to dig into it yet
but the spec file in the dist (http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/libsrs2-1.0.18.tar.gz)
wont work either on a FC system.
Will check back later tonight


Philip wrote:
Of course I ment build error not compilation error
it definatly doesnt work on FC3 FC4 FC5 & FC6 (manual compilation works)
all got the same error I listed below.
On centos 4.4 it worked

Philip wrote:
Hello
I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site
I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ?
I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines
same build error
any ideas ?
Thx
-P

---- cut here ---

Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95317
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ cd libsrs2-1.0.18
+
DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.
0.18
+ export DOCDIR
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + exit 0
Provides: libsrs2.so.0
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libnsl.so.1 libresolv.so.2 libsrs2.so.0 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
  /usr/lib/libsrs2.so


RPM build errors:
   Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
  /usr/lib/libsrs2.so


-------- cut here -----




---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to