Yes.
Jason P wrote:
> Do these permissions look correct for qmail-dk? I'm just trying to think of
> something...
>
> -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 49216 Mar 6 12:36 qmail-dk
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:07 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures
>
> Jason P wrote:
>> Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks. I've
>> tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results. I
>> cannot understand what is happening or why. Might there be a package
>> domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly? I've
>> upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records,
>> and sent out various tests. Sometimes it works, and other times it
>> doesn't. Does anyone have any clues? I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>
> qmail-dk is broken in some cases. That's why we don't use the BG settings in
> DKVERIFY. Some keys (gmail in particular) don't verify correctly.
>
> I'm not aware of a problem with outgoing signatures though. You might want
> to set "t=y" in your _domainkey DNS record until Alexey (or someone) gets a
> chance to fix up qmail-dk. FWIW, gmail (google, who's the force behind DK
> and DKIM) runs DK with t=y. DKIM will be relacing DomainKeys anyway some
> time in the future. DKIM was recently approved as a standard, but there's no
> toaster (or qmail TTBOMK) implementation of it yet.
>
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
