I´m still stuck with this problem. Could be a hardware-related problem?
This is my /proc/cpuinfo (2 CPUs)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] # cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3208.079
cache size      : 1024 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx
lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6423.75

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 15
model           : 4
model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3208.079
cache size      : 1024 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx
lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6415.09


And my kernel:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] # uname -a
Linux host.domain.com 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 11 22:57:02
EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

As I said before, I´m having ssl-dependency problems when I try to
install qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.rpm package (builded with "--with
fdr40").

I'm building a test machine with FC4.


On 3/9/07, Natalio Gatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure you used 'rpmbuild --rebuild --with fdr40' to make this package.
>
> Seems to me you're experiencing a build error.
>
> Erik

Yes, I used the correct flag whe I build the package.

Here are my libssl and libcrypto in /lib:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /lib] # ll libssl*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     16 mar  7 11:43 libssl.so.0.9.7 -> libssl.so.0.9.7f
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 228388 oct 12  2005 libssl.so.0.9.7a
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 230056 oct 12  2005 libssl.so.0.9.7f
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     16 mar  4 16:30 libssl.so.4 -> libssl.so.0.9.7a
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     16 feb  6  2006 libssl.so.5 -> libssl.so.0.9.7f


[EMAIL PROTECTED] /lib] # ll libcrypto*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      19 mar  7 11:46 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 ->
libcrypto.so.0.9.7f
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 1111528 oct 12  2005 libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 1089068 oct 12  2005 libcrypto.so.0.9.7f
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      19 mar  4 16:30 libcrypto.so.4 ->
libcrypto.so.0.9.7a
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root      19 feb  6  2006 libcrypto.so.5 ->
libcrypto.so.0.9.7f


>
> On 3/7/07, Natalio Gatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello List:
> > I´m having a problem with a FC40 system. It builds correctly but when
> > I try to install it via RPM  it fails with the following error:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -Uvh 
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.i386.rpm
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> >         libcrypto.so.0.9.7 is needed by qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.i386
> >         libssl.so.0.9.7 is needed by qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13.i386
> >
> > I have installed openssl and openss-devel:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/admin/qmail-toaster] # rpm -qa | grep ssl
> > openssl-0.9.7f-7.10
> > openssl-devel-0.9.7f-7.10
> >
> > Is it just a falied dependencies check? Should I install it with --force?
> >
> > Salutti,
> >
> > Natalio.
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to