stock as in default 'factory' settings, which is sbl.spamhause.org.
You'll probably get much better rejection with the loose or moderate qtp
blacklists. See http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/#qtp-set-rbls
Jim Shupert, Jr. wrote:
>
> If I may jump in here with just a quick Q...
> what is ment by "the stock blocklist"?
>
> thnaks
>
>> Are you using something more than the stock blocklist? That can reduce
>> your
>> scanning load substantially.
>>
>> Justice London wrote:
>>> Yeah, but it's better than just getting the message rejected, which
>>> seems to be happening right now if something happens to spamassassin.
>>> This is bad since our clients then call and complain to no end.
>>>
>>> Justice London
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 21:31 +0200, Janno Sannik wrote:
>>>> seems dangerous since this could be exploited by hitting mailserver
>>>> with
>>>> lot's of spam and getting it to go through that way
>>>>
>>>> Justice London wrote:
>>>>> Is there a way to get simscan/spamassassin to do a soft reject of
>>>>> messages, say under high load situations where spamassassin isn't
>>>>> responding properly? I have found that when spamassassin either can't
>>>>> accept a new connection, for whatever reason, that the client is
>>>>> passed
>>>>> a 451 error right away. Is there a way to instead just have simscan
>>>>> fail the spamassassin test and just pass the message un-checked?
>>>>>
>>>>> Justice London
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
