Hi,

Now I'm able to see signature in my mails, but also getting error.
Please see details below:

                DomainKey-Signature: 

                 a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=mailserver; h=to:subject
:mime-version:date:from:cc:message-id:content-type; q=dns; s= dkim1;
b=EJJf493aRwtpqumbElVUhczVFtJi4Y+XhG9rcW5lMMvMQe5rQJsV5BE BF/QITML9

                 DKIM-Signature: 

                 v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=mailserver; h=to:subject
:mime-version:date:from:cc:message-id:content-type; q=dns; s= dkim1;
bh=FNfmzKx9JuLnfrW3zJJj57jDbkc=; b=Mpco6Xx/zZkP0IxiYSZiNk
RHuFuGDzOMsJdmkkw+YIYygZiWN4a33AeFk1kXbXrW

                Authentication-Results: 

                 mta179.mail.ac4.yahoo.com from=vanaz.com; domainkeys=fail (bad
syntax); from=mailserver; dkim=permerror (no key)

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 19:04 Anil Aliyan wrote:

OK I got ur mail and it has both the signatures .... its working man.

 

 

Try sending some test message to any of yours account on gmail and
yahoo then check the headers.

 

Regards,

 

Anil Aliyan

 

 

FROM: Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in] 
SENT: Monday, April 05, 2010 6:44 PM
TO: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
SUBJECT: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

 

Done. Sorry I had forgot to do qmailctl cdb.

Anyway Anil please check whether you received my mail or not.

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 18:36 Anil Aliyan wrote:

That’s nice. If you would have simply renamed the domainkey folder
would have served the purpose. Coz if the domainkey folder doesn’t
exist that line in the tcp.smtp will not have any effect.

 

Regards,

 

Anil Aliyan

 

FROM: Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in] 
SENT: Monday, April 05, 2010 6:30 PM
TO: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
SUBJECT: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

 

Dear Anil,

Yes, dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com is the same key which I generate for
DKIM.
Second, right now DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/%/private". So do I
modify it to DKSIGN="".

Regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 18:23 Anil Aliyan wrote:

Dear Amit,

1) do I need to remove delete domainkey folder from control? 

 

SIMPLY RENAME THE DOMAINKEY FOLDER TO DOMAIN-KEY OR SOMETHING ELSE ,
THAT’S UPTO YOU.

2) do I need to modify DKSIGN="" in tcp.smtp?   

 

YOU DON’T HAVE TO MAKE ANY CHANGES IN YOUR TCP.SMTP, JUST KEEP THEM
AS IT IS. 

3) do I need to modify my DNS server entries and if yes then what the
new entry I should made?

 

IF THE DNS ENTRY FOR DKIM1._DOMAINKEY.VANZA.COM IS THE SAME KEY YOU
HAVE GENERATED FOR DKIM THEN YOU NEED NOT DO ANYTHING ELSE. JUST KEEP
THE SAME KEY AND SAME KEY WILL BE USED FOR VERIFICATION OF BOTK DKIM
AND DOMAINKEY.

 

 

Regards,

 

Anil Aliyan

 

FROM: Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in] 
SENT: Monday, April 05, 2010 6:13 PM
TO: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
SUBJECT: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

 

Dear Anil,

Ok. After modifying this, I have queries:
1) do I need to remove delete domainkey folder from control? 
2) do I need to modify DKSIGN="" in tcp.smtp?
3) do I need to modify my DNS server entries and if yes then what the
new entry I should made?

Thanks and regards,

Amit

At Monday, 05-04-2010 on 18:05 Anil Aliyan wrote:

By default singconf.xml file contains on first line as below and only
signs for DKIM:

 

  

  

    

  

 

 

But if you want to sign mails for Domainkeys as well then you will
have to add one more line just below   AND ABOVE  IN THE ABOVE
EXAMPLE:

 

 

REGARDS,

 

ANIL ALIYAN

 

FROM: Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk] 
SENT: Monday, April 05, 2010 5:52 PM
TO: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
SUBJECT: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

 

I have not looked into possibility of having Domainkey and DKIM
signed by DKIM as
I installed qmailtoaster with Domainkey first and then added DKIM
functionality and for this
reason I'd keep them separate.

Regards
Alex

On 05/04/2010 13:15, Anil Aliyan wrote: 

Dear Alex,

 

I do agree with you and we can use two different keys but them you
will have to use both DKIM and Domainkeys separately and need to
configure them separately. But when DKIM alone can handle both DKIM
and Domainkeys with single key its not required to configure
serparately.

 

Regards,

 

Anil Aliyan

 

FROM: Postmaster [mailto:postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk] 
SENT: Monday, April 05, 2010 5:41 PM
TO: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
SUBJECT: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails getting bounced

 

There is no reason why different keys cannot be used for Domainkey
and DKIM.
I am using different keys and have had no problems so far.

Regards
Alex 

On 05/04/2010 13:01, Anil Aliyan wrote: 

I have checked both the entries exists but not updated globally yet.
BUT BOTH KEYS ARE DIFFERENT, please use one single key for both DKIM
and DomainKeys

 

 

If you run dig command from your server you can see these records:

 

DIG TXT _DOMAINKEY.VANZA.COM    (ANSWERS AS BELOW)

 

[r...@ncode-imss ~]# dig txt dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

 

;  DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5  txt dkim1._domainkey.vanaz.com

;; global options:  printcmd

;; Got answer:

;; ->>HEADERHEADER Eric/Jake,
> 
> Will re-installing qmail toaster package can solve the problem?
> 
> Amit
> 
> At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 21:18 Eric Shubert wrote:
> 
> Amit,
> 
> No way to repair qmail-dk, until someone steps up and fixes the
code.
> 
> Check out Jake's videos for a way to use DKIM.
> 
> In order to disable DK entirely, do:
> # cd /var/qmail/bin
> # ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue
> 
> -- 
> -Eric 'shubes'
> 
> Amit Dalia wrote:
> >
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > This was outgoing mail from server and occurred first time only.
If
> > qmail-dk is broken then is there any way to repair this? Is there
> any
> > other way to use Domain Key or DKIM with my server? Else how to
> remove
> > Domain Key from my server.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Amit
> >
> > At Monday, 29-03-2010 on 20:50 Eric Shubert wrote:
> >
> > Amit Dalia wrote:
> > > Dear Team,
> > >
> > > I have been using Domain Key for one of my domain without any
> > problem
> > > from long time. But today 1 server bounced it back mentioning
the
> > below
> > > error:
> > >
> > > [] The reason of the delivery failure was:
> > > >
> > > > 550 Message does not pass DomainKeys requirements for domain
> > vanaz.com
> > >
> > > Is my domain key break?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > >
> > > Amit
> >
> > Perhaps. The qmail-dk program included with QMT is broken in some
> > areas,
> > particularly inbound. While we've been under the impression that
> > signing
> > was working ok, it's entirely possible that there's a bug in
> there. The
> > safest bet is to simply not use it at all.
> >
> > --
> > -Eric 'shubes'
> >
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
> (www.vickersconsulting.com [4])
> Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
> If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
> packages.
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
> For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
> 

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com [4])
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and
installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

 

 

 

 

 

 



Links:
------
[1] http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html
[2] http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/policycheck.html
[3] http://vanaz.com/
[4] http://www.vickersconsulting.com

Reply via email to