Not off the top of my head. The only thing I can come up with is that Simscan is not scoring spam, but something else entirely with that 'CLEAN' message.
On 4/16/2015 7:41 AM, nelson wrote: > Thanks for the info Eric, it helps me understand more about simscan. > > Any hints about the Spam Score and Simscan "odd" behaviour ? > > Regards, > Nelson > > > > On Thursday, 16 April 2015, 20:15, Eric Broch > <ebr...@whitehorsetc.com> wrote: > > > On 4/16/2015 6:44 AM, nelson wrote: > > Eric, > > CMIIW, is it not spamd check the mail, decided the spam score and > then add prefix ***SPAM*** to the subject before passing it to simscan > for execution ? > > What i am confused about is that spamd already flag the email as > spam with spam score 18.3, and simscan said otherwise with result > CLEAN (0.00/6.00) > > I am sure that simscan and spamd were checking the same email > because of the same timestamp (email header using GMT and simscan > using GMT+07), same sender, even the X-Spam-Report saying the right > thing about the email content > Notice in your header: > > Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 25086, pid: 25089, t: 2.0388s > scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.98.4 > /m:55/d:20330 spam: 3.3.2 > > Simscan calls clamav and spamassassin. You can control which is called. > Look into 'simcontrol' here: > http://qmailwiki.org/Simscan/Guide > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com > <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> > For additional commands, e-mail: > qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com > <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com> > >
