This is what they look like running side by side
# find /usr -name openssl*
/usr/lib64/openssl
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/openssl101e.pc
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/openssl.pc
/usr/lib64/openssl101e
/usr/include/openssl
/usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h
/usr/include/openssl/opensslconf.h
/usr/include/openssl/opensslconf-i386.h
/usr/include/openssl/opensslconf-x86_64.h
/usr/include/openssl101e
/usr/include/openssl101e/openssl
/usr/include/openssl101e/openssl/opensslv.h
/usr/include/openssl101e/openssl/opensslconf.h
/usr/include/openssl101e/openssl/opensslconf-i386.h
/usr/include/openssl101e/openssl/opensslconf-x86_64.h
/usr/share/man/man1/openssl.1ssl.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/openssl101e.1.gz
/usr/share/doc/curl-devel-7.15.5/opensslthreadlock.c
/usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e
/usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/openssl.txt
/usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/openssl_button.gif
/usr/share/doc/openssl101e-1.0.1e/openssl_button.html
/usr/share/doc/openssl-0.9.8e
/usr/share/doc/openssl-0.9.8e/openssl.txt
/usr/share/doc/openssl-0.9.8e/openssl_button.gif
/usr/share/doc/openssl-0.9.8e/openssl_button.html
/usr/bin/openssl
/usr/bin/openssl101e
/usr/lib/openssl
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/openssl101e.pc
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc
/usr/lib/openssl101e
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sos/plugins/openssl.pyo
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sos/plugins/openssl.pyc
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sos/plugins/openssl.py
I'm not sure why the rpm was compiled this way (not to replace the old),
but I'm sure they had their reasons.
On 3/9/2018 9:22 AM, Rvaught wrote:
Ok,
Rick
*From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 09, 2018 11:17 AM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Mail Failure
I'm not sure it will work. It installs side by side with old rpms
openssl and openssl-devel. I'd try creating the notlshosts/<fqdn>
first, and let me do some experimenting.
On 3/9/2018 9:14 AM, Rvaught wrote:
Thank you, I will give this a try.
Rick
*From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 09, 2018 10:50 AM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Mail Failure
In fact, here's a binary
https://centos.pkgs.org/5/epel-x86_64/openssl101e-1.0.1e-11.el5.x86_64.rpm.html
and the how to
1. Download the latest epel-release rpm from
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/epel/5/x86_64/
2. Install epel-release rpm:
# rpm -Uvh epel-release*rpm
3. Install openssl101e rpm package:
# yum install openssl101e
On 3/9/2018 8:47 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
That's the issue. TLSv1.1 & TLSv1.2 are only support in
openssl-1.*
You could disable TLS for this email address
(https://serverfault.com/questions/562234/disable-starttls-on-qmail-for-outgoing-messages).
Or, you could upgrade manually openssl on CentOS 5
(https://miteshshah.github.io/linux/centos/how-to-enable-openssl-1-0-2-a-tlsv1-1-and-tlsv1-2-on-centos-5-and-rhel5/).
Eric
On 3/9/2018 8:30 AM, Rvaught wrote:
Version .9.8e-33.el5_11
*From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 09, 2018 10:26 AM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Mail Failure
What version of openssl is on your host?
# rpm -qa | grep openssl
On 3/8/2018 11:22 AM, Rvaught wrote:
I am getting this failure when trying to send mail to
one email address.
The error is TLS connect failed: error 140770FC: SSL
routing: SSL 3_GET_SERVER_HELLO: unknown protocol. It
appears your server wants a TLS or SSL connection or
certificate.
I am running a qmail toaster on Centos 5.11.
How can I tell what version TLS I am using? The
support person on the other end says they do not
accept version of lower than TLS 1.1 or 1.2.
Thanks ,
Rick
--
Eric Broch
White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
--
Eric Broch
White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
--
Eric Broch
White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
--
Eric Broch
White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
--
Eric Broch
White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)
