Thanks Carl. Unfortunately for my server, all of those suggestions are too tight to work with my clients.


However, I did find this web page that offers some good info on ciphers.


https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet.html


This was a pertinent couple of bullet points from the above web page that helped me understand what to remove and/or what was reasonably secure to include in the ciphers lists.


"Do not use WEAK ciphers based on 3DES e.g. (TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA, DES-CBC3-SHA)

Never use even more INSECURE or elder ciphers based on RC2, RC4, DES, MD4, MD5, EXP, EXP1024, AH, ADH, aNULL, eNULL, SEED nor IDEA."


I went through my tlsserverciphers list and found a number of ADH and SEED ciphers and removed them.


For Dovecot, it's easy to find out what ciphers clients are using by modifying the config line as we previously discussed.


However, I'm not sure how to find out what cipers are being used in qmail?? I've searched through logs and don't find any info on ciphers and of course changing verbosity on qmail logs isn't something you can do (or at least something I don't know how to do).


Gary


On 9/4/2019 3:43 PM, Andrew Swartz wrote:

I must retract two cipherlist macros which I tossed out in the email below.   It was late and I was sleepy. 

Both 'HIGH:-SSLv3' and 'ECDHE:DHE:-SSLv3' include ciphersuites with NULL encryption, which means unencrypted.  They can be fixed by removing the nulls:

'HIGH:-SSLv3:-NULL'

and

'ECDHE:DHE:-SSLv3:-NULL'

However, I was just tossing those out as reasonable quickies.

As a privacy enthusiast, I think it would be more valuable to say that I actually USE this:

'TLSv1.2:ECDHE:DHE:-NULL'

Reasons:

1.  It prioritizes the TLS v 1.2 ciphers (all of them)

2.  It adds (at the end) the perfect forward secrecy ciphers from SSLv3 as long as they don't have NULL encryption. 

3.  At the end of the list are about 20 SSLv3 cipher suites that are pretty good among that group.  It includes a couple of 3DES and RC4 ciphersuites, but I'm OK with that considering how weak all of the SSLv3 MAC routines are (i.e. SHA1 and weaker).

4.  I think this yields a list which prioritizes strong ciphersuites but is fairly flexible/tolerant when all else fails.  There is no reason that an old version of openssl cannot connect using one of the twenty SSLv3 ciphersuites it includes.

This cipherlist would be problematic for older machines with openssl < 1.0 because it would not accept the TLSv1.2 and it would add in other ridiculously weak ciphers which are no longer available in the newer versions (i.e. > 1.0).


Some thoughts about Eric's list (ALL:!kRSA:!SRP:!kDHd:!DSS:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK:!RC4:!ADH:!LOW@STRENGTH):

1.  It looks imported from old versions of openssl.  Many of those are no longer available.

2.  When you start with ALL, you have to be very careful to exclude lots of the weak stuff.  It seems safer to start with strong ciphers and then add some weaker ones as you see fit.

3.  The @STRENGTH macro sorts based upon encryption key size, not overall strength of the ciphersuite.  Therefore a lot of SSLv3 cipersuites are prioritized above TLSv1.2 ciphersuites.  That is suboptimal (in general, in my opinion).  Run this to see:  openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:!kRSA:!SRP:!kDHd:!DSS:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK:!RC4:!ADH:!LOW@STRENGTH'

I acknowledge that some of these choices are a matter of taste or implementation, therefore I'm not recommending this for everyone.  But I think it makes for good discussion.

Overall, I'm glad people are interested in this.

-Andy



On 9/3/2019 9:46 PM, Andrew Swartz wrote:
Some background:

During the TLS negotiation, the client gives the server a list of ciphers which it supports, then from that list the server chooses which one to use.

The server's cipher list is a list, in order of preference, of the ciphers it will use (from the client's list).  If there is no overlap between what the client offers and what the server requires, then the connection fails.

The server dose not use the cipher list itself, but rather just passes the list to openssl when it requests establishment of the TLS connection.  Therefore essentially all servers/clients use the same format cipherlist.

The next thing to know is that the list can specify individual ciphers or macros like "TLSv1.2".  Most people do not specify individual ciphers but rather just use the macros.

There is no right or wrong for a cipher list, as the most appropriate list is the one which best meets your security requirements.

The cipherlist "builds" a list of ciphers:

'ALL' adds all of the ciphers (including those with no encrpytion).

'ALL:-SSLv2' adds all the ciphers and then removes all of the SSLv2 ciphers.

A reasonable cipherlist is:
'HIGH:-SSLv3'

If you want "perfect forward secrecy", try this:
'ECDHE:DHE:-SSLv3'
This will yield a subset of the TLSv1.2 ciphers which has the elliptic-curve diffie-hellman-ephemerel ciphers first and then standard diffie-hellman-ephemerel ciphers after that.

If you put that into openssl ciphers ( openssl ciphers -v 'HIGH:-SSLv3') you will note that you only get TLSv1.2 ciphers.  That is because an important concept is the difference between ciphers and protocols.  TLS 1.0 and 1.1 updated the protocol but added no new ciphers.  (you can confirm this by comparing "openssl ciphers -v 'SSLv3' | md5sum" to "openssl ciphers -v 'TLSv1' | md5sum"; you'll get an error if you do it with TLSv1.1 because it does not even have a list of ciphers).

But note that older servers, such as centos 5, will not be able to connect to you (if you use 'ECDHE:DHE:-SSLv3') because their old version of openssl does not support TLSv1.2.  In that case, for STARTTLS, it will fail, which will default to smtp transmission as cleartext.  SMTP is somewhat forgiving, as a failed STARTTLS connection will fall back to cleartext, whereas most other TLS protocols will fail to connect.

This is a segway into the related topic of "protocols".  Many servers (like dovecot) have separate a setting for "TLS cipherlist" and "TLS protocol".  The protocol is the algorithm for establishing the connection, and it is independent of the ciphers.  You should avoid the SSLv3 or TLSv1 protocols, as the these protocols have been found to have weaknesses in how they negotiate the connection (completely unrelated to the strength of the ciphers).

This manpage is a good explanation of all the macros and has examples at the end:
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man1/ciphers.html

People with older versions of openssl (i.e. Centos 5) cannot do TLSv1.2 and will have no choice but to use ciphers/protocols with known weaknesses, and then hope that the other servers do not try to force a certain level of cipher/protocol.  That is not supposed to happen (per smtp/STARTTLS protocol), but I know for a fact that does:  I finally decided to upgrade from centos-5 because an important mail server started refusing to receive mail from mine, with a complaint about not accepting the SSLv3 ciphers.  I think it was Outlook Server, but I'm not sure.

Hope this helps.

-Andy

PS: Someone running the old version of openssl will need to put '-SSLv2" at the end of the cipherlist, whereas the newer version no longer supports it so it doesn't require removing it.  And NO ONE should be using the SSLv2 protocol, as hacking it is trivial.







On 9/3/2019 1:22 PM, CarlC Internet Services Service Desk wrote:
Actually, doing the openssl ciphers > /var/qmail/control/tlsservercipher is a starting point.

After I did that, I then ran my server through some tests. I happen to use OpenVAS [which tool you want to use to find insecure SSL connections is up to you]. It was able to tell me which ciphers to disable and why. Whichever product you use to test the SSL should be one that’s up to date [or can be brought up to date]. For example, I run the tests against my email server every week [for example, I test against port 25, 465 and 587]. In my case, I also use OpenVAS to test the HTTPS side as well.

If you’re using dovecot, you will want to also put the ssl_cipher_list in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf as well as the ssl_protocols list. This protects your IMAPS and POP3S protocols. Again, OpenVAS is set to run against those protocols as well.

Carl

*From:*Gary Bowling [mailto:g...@gbco.us]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 03, 2019 03:35 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] SSL Problem Dovecot

Thanks for that Carl. I'm running openssl-1.0.2k-16.el7_6.1.x86_64

Pretty much everything about my server is continuously updated stock Centos 7. Currently at CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)

I do have epel installed, which updates some things and the qmt repo. That's it, and I'm a stickler for NOT installing anything that isn't done through yum and those repos. I've done this long enough to know that it's much easier to maintain, migrate to a new server, etc. is you're running everything in a managed way. So installing the repos and doing yum installs is pretty much the only way anything ever changes on my server, sans config files.

Would be very interested in knowing not only the proper tlsservercipher file for this type of server, but also how to create/recreate it if it's a command done from openssl. Looks like you can create it with the command.

openssl ciphers > /var/qmail/control/tlsservercipher

But what I'm reading is that your advice is to NOT do that due to security concerns. So what would you recommend?

Thanks, Gary

On 9/3/2019 3:28 PM, CarlC Internet Services Service Desk wrote:

    Your real problem is that this file is different based on which
    CentOS you’re on [or should I say, which openssl is loaded]. If you
    have CentOS 7, with openssl 1.0.2k, you can tune this file to
    include each cipher you want [the file can actually be 10+ lines
    long wrapped]. This is so you can remove all the “hacked” ciphers,
    especially to force your clients security to remain high. If your
    running openssl 0.9.x, you don’t get the newer TLS ciphers you need
    to be secure.

    Using the default is way too low, and if you do, you will where
    someone gets hacked over a ‘free’ WiFi connection [because you had
    SSL 3.0/TLS 1.0 on].

    Carl

    *From:*Gary Bowling [mailto:g...@gbco.us]
    *Sent:* Tuesday, September 03, 2019 02:58 PM
    *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
    <mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] SSL Problem Dovecot

    So this may be an issue of the tlsserverciphers file. Some times
    it's interesting not knowing what your doing! haha

    I guess the question I have is.. What is the proper tlsserverciphers
    for a qmailtoaster with a letsencrypt certificate. If that even
    makes sense.

    And what is the proper way to actually do it. I've read multiple
    things on various forums, including here.

    One says to do:

    echo
    "!EDH:!DHE:!RC4:!ADH:!DSS:HIGH:+AES128:+AES256-SHA256:+AES128-SHA256:+SHA:!3DES:!NULL:!aNULL:!eNULL"
     > /var/qmail/control/tlsserverciphers

    One says to do:

    openssl ciphers 'MEDIUM:HIGH:!SSLv2:!MD5:!RC4:!3DES' >
    /var/qmail/control/tlsserverciphers

    yet another says to create a sym link to the servercert.pem file.

    ln -sf /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
    /var/qmail/control/tlsserverciphers

    I guess it has to do with how tight you want security to be and
    maybe tlsserverciphers can contain various forms of how to define
    that. Just looking for what "most" people would use for an up to
    date Centos 7 server.

    Thanks, Gary

    On 9/3/2019 11:04 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:

        I had to get a new cert for my server, which I installed
        yesterday. Now I'm having problems with certain clients logging
        in. I get the following error in the dovecot.log.

        TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408A10B:SSL
        routines: ssl3_get_client_hello:wrong version number

        Any help would be appreciated.

        Thanks, Gary

        --         ____________________
        Gary Bowling
        ____________________

        ---------------------------------------------------------------------
        To unsubscribe, e-mail:
        qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
        <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For
        additional commands, e-mail:
        qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
        <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>

    --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
    unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
    <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For
    additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
    <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com

Reply via email to