On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 03:44:55PM +0100, Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Nice patch as I can see. There are some qooxdoo conventions which you 
> seem to already have coded like quite good.
> 
> One problem I have with your patch. The QxFieldSet uses a QxAtom to 
> display a text/icon combination for the legend. You seem to create an 
> additional checkbox in your code and place it before the atom. I think 
> this is not a good idea. If you have a look at QxCheckBox you will see 
> that it inherits from QxAtom. Why not simply use a wrapper system which 
> inserts a QxAtom or a QxCheckBox depending if checkable in activated or 
> not. Or what's about another widget which inherits from QxFieldset, 
> named QxCheckableFieldset or something, which change the default 
> behaviour of creating an atom so that it use a QxCheckbox. Then you 
> could also remove your property "checkable". What's your opinion?

In my patch, I insert QxInputCheckIcon before legend label instead of legend
icon. In latest QxCheckBox in _createIcon you are inserting icon at the
beginning of QxCheckBox widget. I don't.

--
mouse


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Qooxdoo-devel mailing list
Qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to