Andreas Junghans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not about any significant advantage. It's just what the JavaScript > language specification allows when calling Date.UTC. Of course, there's no > need for us to follow this (after all, _we_ are the ones deciding which > subset of JavaScript we support). However, I think it would be a nice touch > to have more optional numbers, and Til pointed out that it can also reduce > traffic (depending on how many dates without times are sent). Anyway, it's > not really important, and I'm fine with both ways.
Like I said, the change to the server is trivial. qooxdoo will still always send the complete date (all fields). Go ahead and make the call. I'll make the change if you think it's worthwhile. Cheers, Derrell Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
