In this case it would be enough to use vObject != null &&
or even vObject && Changed in SVN. Sebastian Andreas Junghans schrieb: > Am 03.08.2006 um 12:50 schrieb Dietrich Streifert: > >> Yes it works now with rev 3723. Thank you. >> >> BTW: what is the difference of >> >> if (typeof vObject !== qx.constant.Type.UNDEFINED && vObject !== >> null) and > > IMHO, this whole if statement should be shortened to this: > > if (vObject != null) > > This has the same effect (because undefined == null, but not > undefined === null in JavaScript). But it's much more readable (and I > doubt it's any slower - if you insist, I'll produce a test ;-)). > >> if (vObject) > > if (vObject) is equivalent to something like > > if (vObject != false && vObject != null) > > Regards, > > Andreas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
