I'm confused a little. Why do we need put package name in xml tag? I have seen some examples from branch 0.5 and there use syntax without any packages.
We can try to use following syntax: <xml ... xmlns:qx="http://qooxdoo.org/somefolder"; xmlns:qxpackage="qx.ui.form" xmlns:qxpackage2="qx.ui.form2" ...> <qx:qxpackage:button> <qx:qxpackage2:button> It's only supposition. I don't know whether xml namespase allow contain anything different from URL. I investigate this question. Ricardo Borillo wrote: > Hi, > > What about using: > > <qx:Button p="qx.ui.form"> > > > I think it's a good idea to separate class name from package. In this > way, if a class is moved from one package to another, you only have to > change the "p" property and > keeping XML tag unchanged... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
