Sebastian Werner schrieb:
> Christian Boulanger schrieb:
>
>> Sebastian Werner schrieb:
>>
>> <snip>
>>> However I would like to mention again, that this is not a good idea.
>>> Please use the userData support instead of custom runtime added properties.
>>>
>>> obj.setUserData("myproperty", "thevalue");
>>> alert(obj.getUserData());
>>>
>>>
>> User data doesn't support all the nice features of real properties (such
>> as the _modifyFoo methods - which I assume still exist in the 0.6
>> version??) and you cannot use them if you want to use XML markup to
>> support custom properties. So that's not an option for me.
>>
> Yes, that's true. User Data is much more lightweight.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
I think the extensible nature of qooxdoo (even at runtime) and the
property system is one very cool feature of qooxdo, so I wouldn't scare
people away from using it ;-)
C.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
