"Hugh Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The Table namespace is getting somewhat cluttered, and will become >> more so as additional Data Cell Renderers are soon added. It seems >> worthwhile to split up this single-level namespace into an appropriate >> hierarchy. > > As a user of the table with a lot of success, I agree about this change. > > If I get time to implement the namespace optimisation (yet another step for > the compiler!) then the depth of the namespace won't matter.
>From a user perspective, the length of the namespace increases only by 1-2 characters (dots) in most cases. Only on a few of the internal classes that are extended internally to provide the externally accessible class does the namespace increase a bit more. Users will generally never see those. As far as run-time, which your optimizer will help deal with, these are not objects which are frequently allocated anyway, so the difference should be fairly inconsequential. > BTW, checkin 6124 looks pretty exciting ;-) Thanks. :-) I think it's been one of the most asked for features over the past many months. Once it gets the quirks worked out of it (I discovered double sets of scroll bars in some cases, for some yet-to-be-determined reason), I think it will end up being really useful and regularly used, even if it doesn't become the default. Cheers, Derrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
