Hi, Before adopting qooxdoo last summer, I studied some of them, specially Dojo and OpenLaszlo. All of them were (and continue) in heavy development. The decision wasn't easy, and now it is hardest, as more frameworks evolve.
I'm very happy with the latest improvements in Qooxdoo, and the ease of usability. It is server independent (I haven't had to change much of my server-side). Some of the toolkits you list like MochiKit aren't real competing, as they don't have a complete widget library. Rahul Sharma-4 wrote: > > Just a list of competing frameworks as far as Qooxdoo is concerned. > > Is it possible that we can prepare a competitive analysis, list of > shortcomings we have and make them as a base for our next releases? Also > a Qooxdoo Advantage section can be listed on our website ( consider > myself a very integral part of Qooxdoo now) > > > > . > > 1. Yahoo UI, ext > 2. GWT > 3. Dojo > 4. Backbase > 5. ActiveWidgets > 6. Bindows > 7. Dojo > 8. Echo2 > 9. JackBe > 10. jQuery > 11. Mochikit > 12. Moo.fx > 13. Openlazlo - Flash based > 14. Scriptaculous (Prototype-based) > 15. Rico (Prototype-based) > 16. TIBCO GI (General Interface) > > > > Upcoming toolkit is FLUID, this is being worked on by a number of > universities and corporations, it has $8 Million in funding. We should > collaborate with them to some extent. > > > > What do you guys think? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Competing-Frameworks-for-Qooxdoo-tf3601221.html#a10075198 Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
