Hello Sascha,
> Hello!
>
> I am currently working on the integration of qooxdoo into the XML11
> project, as I mentioned some time ago. A part of what we do is
> translating Java classes to javascript. But I am running into the
> problem, that whenever I have a package called "java", qooxdoo fails.
> Is this maybe a reserved word?
> I can reproduce this error very easily: If I say
> qx.Class.define("java.Test")... and try to create a new object with
> new java.Test() it tells me, that the constructor could not be found.
> If I change it to "javi.Test", for example, everything is fine. I am
> using version 0.7 beta-1.
>
> Is this a bug in qooxdoo, a browser reserved word or a limitation on
> purpose? Of course, having "java" as the package name should never
> happen in usual AJAX applications, but in our case it unfortunately
> happens. If there is no way, I have to implement some kind of
> name-changing, whenever the package name "java" is occuring. But it
> would be nice if this could be avoided.
>
> Thanks for you help!
> Sascha Häberling
At least in FireFox "java" is reserved:
<http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference:Global_Objects:java>
Best Fabian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
