Hugh Gibson schrieb:
> The API documentation system doesn't include any theme classes. This is
> because the system doesn't appear to consider these as proper classes.
> However, in trying to work out what themes can be provided and how to
> derive from them it is essential information. For example, qx.theme.ext
> doesn't appear in the tree, and qx.theme.Ext doesn't appear in qx.theme.
> It all has to be found by searching the source code which makes
> programming unnecessarily difficult.
> 
> The documentation could just be a reformatting of the source code. 
> 
> Is this being considered? Should I raise an bug to cover it?

Not for the moment I would say. You can open an enhancement request 
however. APIs need some special view for the API viewer. But such a 
thing is not planned currently.

The major question is what a theme in the API viewer would look like. 
What information should be presented there? A list of defined theme 
entries. The type of theme (widget, icon, appearance, ...)

Please put all these things in the enhancement request using bugzilla. 
Thanks a lot.

Sebastian

> 
> Hugh
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to