Hi Jean-Baptiste, Am 29.06.2009 um 14:11 schrieb Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog:
> About other lib, I was thinking about http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ > Any feedback ? Never used it, so I'm not able to comment. > I didn't read anything about Date restriction in gson. > I understand that qooxdoo Date serialization is special but all good > implementation of JSON serializer allow for custom serialization/ > deserialization, so we could make qooxdoo Date serialization case > optional. Careful with that. Usually, custom (de)serialization is achieved via additional attributes ("hints") in the transmitted JSON data. However, the Date support in qooxdoo works via direct "new Date(...)" expressions. I haven't looked at the Google lib you mentioned, but I seriously doubt that this kind of syntax can be plugged in easily. (Again, we might not want to keep the qooxdoo date support, but that's a separate discussion, see bug #1400.) Anyway, why are you so keen on replacing the low-level JSON lib on the Java side? What's wrong with the one from json.org? I'd say "never touch a running system" in this case, except there's something seriously wrong or missing from the json.org version. Regards, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
