On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:50, Fritz Zaucker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > what has been set, although I've never had a need for such thing.
>
> > Option (b) sounds appropriate. I agree there should be a way to retrieve
> I also think that (b) is more appropriate than accessing protected
> variables
> in the derived class.
>
> > It's all done programatically (by the developer) in nearly every case, so
> > the developer should know what has been set.
>
> Fact is, that the Smart table model contribution (which extends the simple
> table model) currently tries to access this.__sortMethods. This fails in
> the
> build version as the private names are optimized "away".
>
That is sufficient justification for a need to retrieve the sort methods.
Yes, if you supply a tested patch, I will commit it. Please generate a bug
report and then attach your patch to it, for tracking purposes.
Derrell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
