On 06/15/10 14:12, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog wrote: > On 15 juin 2010, at 13:03, thron7 wrote: > > >> This was not the point. The point was that we have a direction, and that >> things have to fit into that direction in order to be adopted. >> > > What is that direction, could we know ? > Who give that direction ? Is it done in the spirit of open source community ? > What is the process of decision, committee, ... ? > > Answering that will answer all the other question about people involvement. > > >
Hi, 1) We absolutely need answers to the above questions. 2) Most people think that the ml is great. Well, I think the core team is too nice. They never say no and they try to answer every single question in the ml, no matter how moronic it is. It's a real time drain for them, they should be doing real work instead of explaining joe randomcoder the basics of javascript. I say launch the qooxdoo-users list and ignore it :) Let the users dabble in their own mud and have qooxdoo-devel only reserved for discussions that are in the scope of the previous point along with implementation details, etc. Not everybody can contribute code or documentation, but everybody who honestly wants to support qooxdoo can answer the occasional newbie about a particular aspect of js/qooxdoo ecosystem. So, what do you think? Best regards, Burak ps: I hope I'm not making too much noise. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
