Hi, First, the filter property is for textField, not for each character. Both filter and bigFilter do the same thing as I see it - they do not allow certain characters to be entered. the only difference is the implementation.
while the existing one checks for substrings of the value of the textField [i.e. for "1234" it checks 1, then 12, then 123, then 1234] yours tests for the whole string once. for sure it is faster. also, yours, when entering a non valid character returns to the oldvalue, instead to resetting it to null as the existing one does. i propose to file a bug, and say that "filter' property of AbstractField to be implemented the way you say in your patch. cheers, Gabi -- View this message in context: http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/bigFilter-and-filter-for-AbstractField-tp5800896p5807449.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
