On 05/05/2013 05:41 PM, Petr Kobalíček wrote: > Hi, > > I like qooxdoo and I used it in the past, but I feel like saying also > some cons, instead of repeating pros again and again:) > > 1. Qooxdoo is too heavy. Even if you try to minimize as much as > possible the qooxdoo js is more than 1MB (I'm talking about standard > setup containing basic widgets, not application showing "Hello" > button). This makes qooxdoo impossible to use on classic web-pages.
We're working in that direction, in the sense of adding visual widgets to qx.Website. > > 2. Backward compatibility makes toolking even more heavy. Today's > browsers improved, there is no need for IE6/IE7 support, or support > for archaic browsers like Firefox 1.5, etc. Yes, maybe somebody > disagrees, but for me keeping this support is something like making a > desktop application for Windows 3.1. What I mean here is that today > many things can be done easier than they are done in qooxdoo. For > example the whole bom layer, batch rendering, etc, is an unnecessary > complication. We are working on that :-). T. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
