Alan Conway wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 16:39 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
The point of the AMQP API is not that it is more efficient or less
repulsive but that it more directly reflects the protocol. JMS has its
model, which will be what the majority will be familiar with and use.
AMQP has its own model so why not have an API that reflects that model
more naturally?
I don't see "reflecting the protocol" as a goal for an API. I see
"making it easy for users to what they want" as the main goal.
Agreed, but if what they want to do is use the protocol, then the API
should allow them to do that without forcing them to learn how that API
is mapped to the protocol concepts, it should be obvious.
