Yes, I think that a protocol-level API is fine. I had thought you were
proposing something at a higher level.

Are you planning on fleshing it out on a branch?

RG


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Rajith          |
|         |           Attapattu"       |
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           om>              |
|         |                            |
|         |           20/09/2006 15:49 |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           qpid-dev         |
|---------+---------------------------->
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                 |
  |       To:       [email protected]                               
                                                 |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                                 |
  |       Subject:  Re: To extend or not (was RE: QPID/HermesJMS)               
                                                 |
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Greg,

What I am also pushing is for a protocol level API.
Even if we don't document this or promote this API, I still think from a
design POV we need to have a cleaner seperation.
So why not have protocol API and then have that 'extended JMS API' if you
will.

But lets not kill the idea of a protocol level API.

Does this sound like a reasonable compromise???

Regards,

Rajith

On 9/19/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert Greig wrote:
> > Unless what is being proposed is
> > what I read into Gordon's comments (I don't want to put words in your
> > mouth so let me know if I'm misrerepresenting you Gordon) which is a
> > strictly protocol-level API.
>
> Yes, I was talking about a protocol-level API.
>




This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are 
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not 
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates.

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, 
legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you 
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including 
any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and 
any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might 
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its 
use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the 
sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format. Thank you.
 

Reply via email to