On 9/25/06, Steven Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 25/09/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it sounds to me that something like CMS can still abstract out your
> protocol but still give you access to all the features of you broker.
> The destination just needs to carry the exchange, and routing info.
I'm not sure what you are getting at.
Just wanted to confirm that I understood you correctly. I'm not
familiar with all the AMQP terminology yet.
I was just trying to state facts about the JMS Destination abstraction
without getting philosophical :). It's easy to get wrapped up in the
thought that a "destination" is simply somewhere you send stuff.
Equally, it's easy to get wrapped up in the thought that a
"destination" is a physical queue for sending/receiving.
Sounds like we are vigorously agreeing :)
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
