I like the "Qpid" spelling too. or is it Queue Processor Interface Daemon Queue Processing Internet Daemon :-) then a Posix startup process can be "qpid", where "d" has the conventional meaning!
....and... "qpid" for classnames? Won't that conflict with the CamelCase idiom? It'll definitely work for package names, which will reduce the liklihood of classnames containing "qpid" but: class qpidQueueAdaptor doesn't look right class QpidQueueAdaptor does. If Qpid is the brand, then Qpid should be fine when it appears as the first name in a camelcase symbol. John On 05/10/06, Johnson, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marnie, I'd be happy to help with updating the docs when they are ready. Cheers, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Qpid Branding ? > > I've been working on expanding the user documentation that we have for > Qpid > (Getting Started guide, FAQ, Troubleshooting etc) and Robert put together > (probably with Gordon Sim) some design docs. > > Been waiting for the Confluence Wiki to be available before porting them > across and they could possibly do with some minor updates. > > Regards, > Marnie > > On 10/5/06, Debbie Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Agree. No it wasn't really meant to be an acronym, although there were > > some > > ideas for an acronyn thrown around like product information delivery or > > something like that. Let's see if everyone else agrees with the > spelling > > "Qpid" and we can adjust the logo concepts accordingly. > > > > Is there any existing documentation on qpid? that would be also be > > useful > > as we build out the content on the wiki and the web-site. > > > > Deb > > > > On 10/5/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Qpid seems right to me. QPid or QPID suggest an acronym which I don't > > > think is what we're going for? > > > > > > On 05/10/06, Debbie Moynihan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There were some discussions about it during the renaming process, > but > > > there > > > > doesn't seem to be consistent usage. I agree it is important to > have > > a > > > > consistent name and spelling. I can have a design firm come up with > > some > > > > logo concepts over the next couple days. I've been involved in the > > AMQP > > > > logo and branding discussions as part of the AMQP Working Group. > > > > > > > > I personally like Qpid, which is what Eric put on the project web- > site > > > > docs. Does anyone disagree with the usage of the project name > spelled > > > > Qpid? > > > > > > > > Debbie > > > > > > > > On 10/5/06, Marnie McCormack < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I wondered if there's been a conversation on any mailing list > about > > > Qpid > > > > > branding (logos etc) ? I remember a debate about amqp branding on > > the > > > pmc, > > > > > but haven't spotted any Qpid discussions. > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that across the various contributers' websites and press > > > > > releases > > > > > we don't seem to be consistent about the case i.e. QPid, qpid, > Qpid > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > Do we have a clear agreement on the branding for Qpid ? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Marnie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Ritchie > > > > > > >
