No it needs to be done in both... if you close something in one language
only then clone the JIRA for the
other language. If you do it for both then just close the JIRA.
Carl.
John O'Hara wrote:
We need to understand how to deal with features in the Java and C++
brokers.
Is it done when its done in one of them?
John
On 10/10/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/10/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These spring to mind:
> 1) Complete local transaction support (XA not urgent at all)
What do think is missing?
> 3) Staging for larger messages (will benefit from the work
happening on
the
> protocol content classes over at AMQP.ORG)
This is part of QPID-17 which I am working on.
> 4) JMS Compliance (approximate first so people familiar with JMS don't
get
> surprises; not aiming for TCK compliance of any sort on a first run,
plus we
> don't have the TCK :-)
We are doing pretty well on JMS compliance. The major outstanding item
is message selectors which we have discussed at some length on the
list. I will raise a Jira for it. We also need queue browsing which
has been discussed before and I think will "come out in the wash" with
our content class redesign proposal.
RG
