+1 from me. Regards Tejeswar
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Vinoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [java] client tests hanging On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote: > On 10/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote: >> > As you all know we're currently getting organised for M1. >> >> Yep, and I've been working to make maven ready for it. Brian asked >> the question about moving to maven for M1 in another thread last >> night, and I'm surprised to see no answers to it this morning. >> >> > At things stand >> > there are several open JIRAs for this work. Most of the changes you >> > are >> > seeing are directly related to the legal/license requirements for >> > releasing, >> > with some others being derived from these changes. >> >> This isn't accurate. I don't think the reorganization of tests that >> occurred earlier this week was necessary for legal/license >> requirements. >> >> All I'm saying in my email below is that 1) it would have been nice >> to have gotten advance notice that the tests were going to be >> reorganized, so that I wouldn't have wasted time moving the old stuff >> around on my branch, and 2) the only thing keeping maven from being >> ready for M1 is the need for further improvement to the test >> structure. > > I'm sorry you feel like you wasted time moving the old stuff arround. > We were having increased problems with the tests failing and not > seeing exactly why so started the re-org as per QPID-37 created back > Oct 17th. IMO a JIRA is a definitely good thing to have for cases like this, but it's not enough -- it's no substitute for a simple note to qpid- dev announcing that you're planning to reorganize stuff to resolve it. --steve
