Hi,
good questions.
On 12/12/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I noticed this in the management/eclipse/pom.xml file:
<groupId>org.apache.qpid.management</groupId>
<artifactId>org.apache.qpid.management.ui</artifactId>
Questions:
1. Do we really want the groupId to differ from all the other qpid
artifacts? If not, it should be org.apache.qpid.
I named the group like this because the management is subfolder under qpid
and if there are other management applications written, then those can be in
a subgroup. I feel that makes the structure bit clear.
2. The artifactId doesn't need full name qualification, unless I'm
missing something special pertinent to Eclipse plugins. It should
just be qpid-management-ui or something to that effect.
the artifact id is named like this based on other available eclipse plugins.
All eclipse plugins, which are included in eclipse sdk are named like that.
Other plugins which I came across while developing were also named in this
format. The eclipse plugins in projects like Geronimo also are named like
that.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/
Geronimo even has the directory name as artifactid. To match that we will
need to create another directory named "org.apache.qpid.management.ui" under
eclipse-plugin directory. I didn't do that earlier because I didn't feel the
need for it.
Shall I fix?
If what I mentioned makes sense then this doesn't have to be fixed.
--steve
